Gemini: research blake2b migration for stable fingerprints #101

Open
opened 2026-05-28 01:17:57 +02:00 by codex · 0 comments
Collaborator

Context

DeepSeek suggested replacing SHA-1 with blake2b. That has compatibility implications because fingerprints are user-visible.

Task

Research whether migrating stable digests is worth it and what compatibility path would be required.

Acceptance criteria

  • Short note comparing keep-SHA1-with-comment vs migrate-to-blake2b.
  • Explicitly discuss baseline/fingerprint compatibility.
  • No code behavior changes.

Verification

  • Cite affected files/functions and current fingerprint consumers.
## Context DeepSeek suggested replacing SHA-1 with `blake2b`. That has compatibility implications because fingerprints are user-visible. ## Task Research whether migrating stable digests is worth it and what compatibility path would be required. ## Acceptance criteria - Short note comparing keep-SHA1-with-comment vs migrate-to-blake2b. - Explicitly discuss baseline/fingerprint compatibility. - No code behavior changes. ## Verification - Cite affected files/functions and current fingerprint consumers.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
pdurlej/fallow-py#101
No description provided.