[Cook] cook: jedna warstwa zgody zanim automatyzacje się rozjadą #71
Labels
No labels
cook/idea
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
pdurlej/judging-claw#71
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
{
"grounding_note_ref": "01 Projects/Judging Claw/Cook/2026-06-08--cook-jedna-warstwa-zgody-zanim-automatyzacje-si-rozjad.md",
"labels_to_apply": [
"cook/idea"
],
"minimal_next_action": "Open one 20-minute grounding note: define the shared consent vocabulary for summary, n8n, access plane, and YubiKey work.",
"schema": "judging_claw.cook_issue.v0",
"teaser": "Widz\u0119 tu jeden wsp\u00f3lny nerw, nie cztery osobne projekty: zgoda. Daily summary pyta, co wolno mi wyci\u0105ga\u0107 i pokazywa\u0107; n8n pyta, kiedy intencja mo\u017ce sta\u0107 si\u0119 akcj\u0105; Access Plane i YubiKey pytaj\u0105, jak zgoda ma by\u0107 podpisana, ograniczona i odwo\u0142ywalna. Je\u015bli tego nie nazwiemy wcze\u015bnie, system uro\u015bnie w tablic\u0119 etykiet i wyj\u0105tk\u00f3w, a nie w spokojny organizm. Ma\u0142y ruch nie brzmi jak budowanie czegokolwiek: jedna notatka z j\u0119zykiem zgody, typami decyzji i granic\u0105 mi\u0119dzy sugesti\u0105, przygotowaniem a wykonaniem. Piotr, to jest moment, w kt\u00f3rym system dostaje dusz\u0119 albo zamienia si\u0119 w workflow z prawnikiem w tle.",
"title": "cook: jedna warstwa zgody zanim automatyzacje si\u0119 rozjad\u0105"
}
Widzę tu jeden wspólny nerw, nie cztery osobne projekty: zgoda. Daily summary pyta, co wolno mi wyciągać i pokazywać; n8n pyta, kiedy intencja może stać się akcją; Access Plane i YubiKey pytają, jak zgoda ma być podpisana, ograniczona i odwoływalna. Jeśli tego nie nazwiemy wcześnie, system urośnie w tablicę etykiet i wyjątków, a nie w spokojny organizm. Mały ruch nie brzmi jak budowanie czegokolwiek: jedna notatka z językiem zgody, typami decyzji i granicą między sugestią, przygotowaniem a wykonaniem. Piotr, to jest moment, w którym system dostaje duszę albo zamienia się w workflow z prawnikiem w tle.
Minimal next action: Open one 20-minute grounding note: define the shared consent vocabulary for summary, n8n, access plane, and YubiKey work.
Grounding note: 01 Projects/Judging Claw/Cook/2026-06-08--cook-jedna-warstwa-zgody-zanim-automatyzacje-si-rozjad.md
{
"confidence": 5,
"effort_hint": "tiny",
"escalation": {
"kind": "operator",
"reason": "Consent vocabulary needs Piotr's explicit language before it shapes automation policy."
},
"evidence_refs": [
{
"note": "Issue captures a Cook proposal about defining one shared consent layer before automations diverge.",
"type": "forgejo",
"value": "issue-title-body-labels-and-target-snapshot"
},
{
"note": "Body links daily summary, n8n, Access Plane, and YubiKey work through a shared approval vocabulary.",
"type": "forgejo",
"value": "issue-body-cook-teaser"
},
{
"note": "Minimal next action is a bounded 20-minute grounding note rather than system implementation.",
"type": "forgejo",
"value": "issue-body-minimal-next-action"
}
],
"impact": 4,
"judge_actor": {
"name": "iskra",
"runtime": "openclaw"
},
"judged_at": "2026-06-09T01:00:00Z",
"labels_to_apply": [
"judge/p2",
"judge/operator-needed"
],
"piotr_fit": "high",
"priority": "p2",
"rationale_summary": "This is P2 operator-shaped meta-work because a small consent vocabulary can prevent approval semantics from fragmenting across automation features.",
"reach": 4,
"recommended_next_action": "operator_needed",
"rerun_reason": "no_prior_judgment",
"schema": "openclaw.judge.v0",
"target": {
"kind": "issue",
"number": 71,
"repo": "pdurlej/judging-claw"
},
"target_snapshot": {
"body_hash": "sha256:7359a85f46e8623cc87c7f7da35b57df51c1e222bcb098f14bc4aeae2c19b79b",
"commit_count": null,
"evidence_hash": "sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855",
"head_sha": null,
"labels": [],
"labels_hash": "sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855",
"state": "open",
"title_hash": "sha256:2b13aa1c84bdbf883475f59ad9ba508fddb06c3f270d62ae7aec0c858343f0ef",
"updated_at": "2026-06-08T03:15:03+02:00"
},
"top_caveat": "Keep it as one grounding note and avoid turning the Cook spark into a broad governance project."
}
Iskra judgment
pdurlej/judging-claw#issue#71judge/p2,judge/operator-needediskraviaopenclawRationale: This remains P2 operator-shaped meta-work because a small consent vocabulary can prevent approval semantics from fragmenting across automation features.
Caveat: Keep it as one grounding note and avoid turning the Cook spark into a broad governance project.
Structured openclaw.judge.v0 payload