gemini(w1): scout audit result activityPublicId coverage #102

New issue

Open

opened 2026-05-28 01:20:39 +02:00 by codex · 1 comment

codex commented

2026-05-28 01:20:39 +02:00

Collaborator

Parent: #2
Agent lane: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Wave: 1 / maintainer foundation
Risk class: medium

Goal

Find write paths that still fail to store/return exact activityPublicId lineage.

Context refs

Open issue #58
docs/agent-mcp-contract.md

Scope

Search create/move/comment/relation/projection write paths.
List which actions return auditPublicId and activityPublicId.
Propose smallest follow-up patches.

Acceptance

Coverage table includes action name, file, current status.
No low-confidence time-window attribution is recommended as canonical.
Risks around projection apply are called out.

Suggested checks

rg -n "activityPublicId|auditPublicId|createAgentAudit|agent_audit" packages scripts

Non-goals / fences

Do not deploy, restart production, rotate secrets, or run production migrations.
Do not widen MCP write authority or public exposure.
Keep the change small enough for one focused PR or one scouting report.

Expected output

A short PR or issue comment with findings, touched files, tests run, and remaining risks.

Parent: #2 Agent lane: Gemini 3.5 Flash Wave: 1 / maintainer foundation Risk class: medium ## Goal Find write paths that still fail to store/return exact `activityPublicId` lineage. ## Context refs - Open issue #58 - `docs/agent-mcp-contract.md` ## Scope - Search create/move/comment/relation/projection write paths. - List which actions return `auditPublicId` and `activityPublicId`. - Propose smallest follow-up patches. ## Acceptance - Coverage table includes action name, file, current status. - No low-confidence time-window attribution is recommended as canonical. - Risks around projection apply are called out. ## Suggested checks - `rg -n "activityPublicId|auditPublicId|createAgentAudit|agent_audit" packages scripts` ## Non-goals / fences - Do not deploy, restart production, rotate secrets, or run production migrations. - Do not widen MCP write authority or public exposure. - Keep the change small enough for one focused PR or one scouting report. ## Expected output A short PR or issue comment with findings, touched files, tests run, and remaining risks.

codex added the

labels

2026-05-28 01:20:39 +02:00

Iskra commented

2026-06-13 03:08:17 +02:00

Collaborator

Iskra judgment

Field	Value
Target	`pdurlej/kan-ductor#issue#102`
Priority	p2
Action	observe
Scores	reach 4 / impact 4 / confidence 5
Piotr fit	high
Effort	small
Labels	`judge/p2`
Judge	`iskra` via `openclaw`

Rationale: This is P2 safety scout work because exact activity lineage is necessary for trustworthy Kan audit receipts and follow-up reasoning.

Caveat: Keep this as a read-only coverage table first; do not bless time-window attribution or mutate projection write paths without a follow-up patch plan.

Structured openclaw.judge.v0 payload

<!-- openclaw.judge.v0 -->
{
  "confidence": 5,
  "effort_hint": "small",
  "escalation": {
    "kind": "none",
    "reason": ""
  },
  "evidence_refs": [
    {
      "note": "Issue scopes a scout audit of write paths for exact activityPublicId and auditPublicId lineage coverage.",
      "type": "forgejo",
      "value": "issue-title-body-labels-and-target-snapshot"
    },
    {
      "note": "Body asks to search create, move, comment, relation, and projection write paths and list current lineage return status.",
      "type": "forgejo",
      "value": "issue-body-scope"
    },
    {
      "note": "Acceptance rejects low-confidence time-window attribution as canonical and calls out projection apply risks.",
      "type": "forgejo",
      "value": "issue-body-acceptance"
    }
  ],
  "impact": 4,
  "judge_actor": {
    "name": "iskra",
    "runtime": "openclaw"
  },
  "judged_at": "2026-06-13T01:06:00Z",
  "labels_to_apply": [
    "judge/p2"
  ],
  "piotr_fit": "high",
  "priority": "p2",
  "rationale_summary": "This is P2 safety scout work because exact activity lineage is necessary for trustworthy Kan audit receipts and follow-up reasoning.",
  "reach": 4,
  "recommended_next_action": "observe",
  "rerun_reason": "no_prior_judgment",
  "schema": "openclaw.judge.v0",
  "target": {
    "kind": "issue",
    "number": 102,
    "repo": "pdurlej/kan-ductor"
  },
  "target_snapshot": {
    "body_hash": "sha256:d411d4a8eefa5085f181540848489ee57a16a501d130b9c704edaa03a2eadc12",
    "commit_count": null,
    "evidence_hash": "sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855",
    "head_sha": null,
    "labels": [
      "api",
      "gemini-flash",
      "priority:p2",
      "safety",
      "scout",
      "small-task"
    ],
    "labels_hash": "sha256:69a1769b5dc697c02e836bb677c3592c2d7b1055e8f604e2d85f8fe997c49037",
    "state": "open",
    "title_hash": "sha256:ccd8d0b71dc5d92fc9ce863e3299cd883fb18e4d03c0dccc781e5470f2cf14d9",
    "updated_at": "2026-05-28T01:20:39+02:00"
  },
  "top_caveat": "Keep this as a read-only coverage table first; do not bless time-window attribution or mutate projection write paths without a follow-up patch plan."
}
<!-- /openclaw.judge.v0 -->

### Iskra judgment | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Target | `pdurlej/kan-ductor#issue#102` | | Priority | p2 | | Action | observe | | Scores | reach 4 / impact 4 / confidence 5 | | Piotr fit | high | | Effort | small | | Labels | `judge/p2` | | Judge | `iskra` via `openclaw` | **Rationale:** This is P2 safety scout work because exact activity lineage is necessary for trustworthy Kan audit receipts and follow-up reasoning. **Caveat:** Keep this as a read-only coverage table first; do not bless time-window attribution or mutate projection write paths without a follow-up patch plan. <details> <summary>Structured openclaw.judge.v0 payload</summary> ```json  { "confidence": 5, "effort_hint": "small", "escalation": { "kind": "none", "reason": "" }, "evidence_refs": [ { "note": "Issue scopes a scout audit of write paths for exact activityPublicId and auditPublicId lineage coverage.", "type": "forgejo", "value": "issue-title-body-labels-and-target-snapshot" }, { "note": "Body asks to search create, move, comment, relation, and projection write paths and list current lineage return status.", "type": "forgejo", "value": "issue-body-scope" }, { "note": "Acceptance rejects low-confidence time-window attribution as canonical and calls out projection apply risks.", "type": "forgejo", "value": "issue-body-acceptance" } ], "impact": 4, "judge_actor": { "name": "iskra", "runtime": "openclaw" }, "judged_at": "2026-06-13T01:06:00Z", "labels_to_apply": [ "judge/p2" ], "piotr_fit": "high", "priority": "p2", "rationale_summary": "This is P2 safety scout work because exact activity lineage is necessary for trustworthy Kan audit receipts and follow-up reasoning.", "reach": 4, "recommended_next_action": "observe", "rerun_reason": "no_prior_judgment", "schema": "openclaw.judge.v0", "target": { "kind": "issue", "number": 102, "repo": "pdurlej/kan-ductor" }, "target_snapshot": { "body_hash": "sha256:d411d4a8eefa5085f181540848489ee57a16a501d130b9c704edaa03a2eadc12", "commit_count": null, "evidence_hash": "sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", "head_sha": null, "labels": [ "api", "gemini-flash", "priority:p2", "safety", "scout", "small-task" ], "labels_hash": "sha256:69a1769b5dc697c02e836bb677c3592c2d7b1055e8f604e2d85f8fe997c49037", "state": "open", "title_hash": "sha256:ccd8d0b71dc5d92fc9ce863e3299cd883fb18e4d03c0dccc781e5470f2cf14d9", "updated_at": "2026-05-28T01:20:39+02:00" }, "top_caveat": "Keep this as a read-only coverage table first; do not bless time-window attribution or mutate projection write paths without a follow-up patch plan." }  ``` </details>

Iskra added the

judge/p2

label

2026-06-13 03:08:17 +02:00