fix(honcho): route gemma through custom provider #372

Merged
pdurlej merged 1 commit from codex/honcho-custom-provider-gemma into main 2026-05-18 09:44:21 +02:00
Collaborator

Canary status: missing — module/runtime config fix; rely on required Forgejo checks and operator review before merge

Canary Context Pack

Product story

Iskra reported that Honcho memory recall still timed out after the Gemma/Ollama switch. Runtime investigation showed Honcho had the Gemma model configured but was still using the native OpenAI provider path for legacy Honcho settings, causing OpenAI-compatible calls to miss Ollama.

What changed

  • Defaults Honcho OpenAI-compatible client to Ollama Cloud when OLLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY is present.
  • Routes legacy Honcho LLM provider aliases to custom instead of native openai.
  • Extends the Honcho/Ollama contract test to assert the custom-provider path.
  • Updates the runbook with the provider alias and runtime override contract.

Why it changed

gemma4:31b-cloud must be sent through Honcho's custom OpenAI-compatible client. Sending that model name through the native OpenAI client produces provider not-found/retry errors and timeouts in the Iskra memory recall path.

Files touched

  • compose/apps/compose.yaml
  • control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_honcho_ollama_contract.py
  • runbooks/honcho-ollama-gemma-switch.md

Relevant context

  • #142 RS2000 cutover/Honcho soak thread
  • #371 Honcho raw memory/tool-result logging privacy follow-up
  • Honcho/Gemma switch runbook

Runtime evidence

  • Runtime mitigation already applied on RS2000: provider aliases set to custom, compatible base URL set to https://ollama.com/v1, provider key rendered from Infisical Token Auth.
  • honcho-api and honcho-deriver are healthy after scoped recreate.
  • In-container settings show summary/deriver/dream/dialectic providers as custom with model gemma4:31b-cloud.
  • Direct synthetic Ollama smoke passed earlier for chat, JSON, and tool-call.

Known constraints

  • Embeddings intentionally remain on text-embedding-3-small and OpenAI until the BGE-M3 vector migration is designed.
  • Runtime compose.env may still contain old explicit values; the runbook documents the later override file ordering required for existing RS2000 state.

Explicit out-of-scope

  • No BGE-M3 production switch.
  • No database migration.
  • No raw memory/tool logging fix beyond documenting #371.

Requested decision

Approve and merge after checks. This PR makes the runtime mitigation durable in desired state.

Merge blockers

  • Test failure in Honcho/Ollama contract.
  • Evidence that Honcho custom provider is incompatible with Ollama Cloud.

Spec sources read

  • compose/apps/compose.yaml — Honcho environment contract
  • control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_honcho_ollama_contract.py — existing Gemma/Ollama assertions
  • runbooks/honcho-ollama-gemma-switch.md — operator runbook
  • Runtime Honcho config/source snippets on RS2000 — to identify provider selection behavior

Tests

  • control-plane/.venv/bin/python -m pytest control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_honcho_ollama_contract.py
  • git diff --check
Canary status: missing — module/runtime config fix; rely on required Forgejo checks and operator review before merge ## Canary Context Pack ### Product story Iskra reported that Honcho memory recall still timed out after the Gemma/Ollama switch. Runtime investigation showed Honcho had the Gemma model configured but was still using the native OpenAI provider path for legacy Honcho settings, causing OpenAI-compatible calls to miss Ollama. ### What changed - Defaults Honcho OpenAI-compatible client to Ollama Cloud when `OLLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY` is present. - Routes legacy Honcho LLM provider aliases to `custom` instead of native `openai`. - Extends the Honcho/Ollama contract test to assert the custom-provider path. - Updates the runbook with the provider alias and runtime override contract. ### Why it changed `gemma4:31b-cloud` must be sent through Honcho's `custom` OpenAI-compatible client. Sending that model name through the native OpenAI client produces provider not-found/retry errors and timeouts in the Iskra memory recall path. ### Files touched - `compose/apps/compose.yaml` - `control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_honcho_ollama_contract.py` - `runbooks/honcho-ollama-gemma-switch.md` ### Relevant context - #142 RS2000 cutover/Honcho soak thread - #371 Honcho raw memory/tool-result logging privacy follow-up - Honcho/Gemma switch runbook ### Runtime evidence - Runtime mitigation already applied on RS2000: provider aliases set to `custom`, compatible base URL set to `https://ollama.com/v1`, provider key rendered from Infisical Token Auth. - `honcho-api` and `honcho-deriver` are healthy after scoped recreate. - In-container settings show summary/deriver/dream/dialectic providers as `custom` with model `gemma4:31b-cloud`. - Direct synthetic Ollama smoke passed earlier for chat, JSON, and tool-call. ### Known constraints - Embeddings intentionally remain on `text-embedding-3-small` and OpenAI until the BGE-M3 vector migration is designed. - Runtime `compose.env` may still contain old explicit values; the runbook documents the later override file ordering required for existing RS2000 state. ### Explicit out-of-scope - No BGE-M3 production switch. - No database migration. - No raw memory/tool logging fix beyond documenting #371. ### Requested decision Approve and merge after checks. This PR makes the runtime mitigation durable in desired state. ### Merge blockers - Test failure in Honcho/Ollama contract. - Evidence that Honcho `custom` provider is incompatible with Ollama Cloud. ## Spec sources read - `compose/apps/compose.yaml` — Honcho environment contract - `control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_honcho_ollama_contract.py` — existing Gemma/Ollama assertions - `runbooks/honcho-ollama-gemma-switch.md` — operator runbook - Runtime Honcho config/source snippets on RS2000 — to identify provider selection behavior ## Tests - `control-plane/.venv/bin/python -m pytest control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_honcho_ollama_contract.py` - `git diff --check`
fix(honcho): route gemma through custom provider
All checks were successful
base-is-main / guard (pull_request) Successful in 2s
canary-required / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 5s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 3s
platformctl plan / auto-apply scope (pull_request) Successful in 20s
pyfallow / Pyfallow gate (control-plane) (pull_request) Successful in 19s
python-ci / Python 3.11 (pull_request) Successful in 39s
python-ci / Python 3.12 (pull_request) Successful in 37s
python-ci / Python 3.13 (pull_request) Successful in 38s
canary-required / canary (pull_request) Successful in 14s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / sanity (pull_request) Successful in 22s
910254b3c8
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
pdurlej/platform!372
No description provided.