WIP: ops: ADR-0013 4th replica — Synology + encrypted pCloud #569
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
pdurlej/platform!569
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "ollama/dziadek-4th-replica-pcloud"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
WIP — 4th replica: Synology + encrypted pCloud
ADR-0013 + 4 operational scripts + runbook for the 4th replica backup system.
Original author: claude (2026-05-11, Dropbox version)
Refreshed by: dziadek / DeepSeek-v4-Pro (2026-05-28, switched to pCloud)
What this ships
scripts/4th-replica/setup-synology.sh— interactive one-time setup (verifies Tailnet, creates share, generates age key, configures rclone pCloud)scripts/4th-replica/sync-to-synology.sh— daily M1→Synology rsync (--delete canonical mirror)scripts/4th-replica/sync-synology-to-pcloud.sh— weekly tar | age | rclone pipeline; rolling 8 weekly backupsscripts/restore_check.sh— monthly restore drill (<30 min target)docs/runbooks/4th-replica.md— full operator proceduresWhy pCloud (not Dropbox)
pCloud sees only ciphertext. Age key stays on operator's machine.
⚠️ THIS REQUIRES OPERATOR EXECUTION
These scripts are NOT just for review — they must be run by the operator:
setup-synology.sh— interactive, needs operator at keyboard on M1What this PR does NOT
Role: deep-reviewer
Refs: ADR-0013, BLOCKERS_FOR_OPERATOR.md §2 (closed), GPT-5.5 Pro oracle review 2026-05-11
ops: ADR-0013 4th replica — Synology + encrypted pCloud (WIP, needs operator)to WIP: ops: ADR-0013 4th replica — Synology + encrypted pCloudCodex parking note: this PR is intentionally WIP/archival, not part of the active night closeout path. Treat it as self-contained recovered knowledge from old branches. Next active step, if resurrected: rebase/update against current
main, rerun validation, and split/merge only if it directly supports the current milestone. This is DR/recovery work, so no script execution or backup mutation from the PR itself.M10 disposition: moved to
10 - Improvements.What this is: 4th replica / Synology+pCloud backup design.
Why parked here: Parked in M10 because it is valuable backup-improvement work, but not required to close current post-M01 restore confidence; resurrect when we explicitly start the extra-replica/offsite-backup track.
This preserves the idea without letting it block M02/M03/M04 closeout. Before reactivation, split it into a narrow issue or PR with concrete acceptance criteria.
Triage verdict (claude): 🟡 OPERATOR-DECISION. ADR + scripts + runbook are solid (claude original, dziadek refreshed Dropbox→pCloud). But it's belt-and-suspenders: M02 DR is already closed + green (local + vps1000 sandbox restores PASS). Two operator questions before any move: (1) do you have / want a Synology NAS + pCloud account? (2) is a 4th replica worth the added moving parts right now? Runtime/recovery + needs hardware → not a clean cousin merge. Parking pending your call; ADR preserved.
Hardware check (claude, via Tailscale) — you're MORE ready than this issue assumed. On the Tailnet right now:
kasia-i-piotr-synology-nas(100.91.208.73) — the Synology IS here + online → the primary local-replica target. ✅macbook-pro-old(100.79.83.27) — a spare old MacBook on Tailnet → a BONUS second local target / warm-standby, beyond the ADR's Synology+pCloud plan.So the "do you have hardware?" question is basically answered: Synology (local) + an extra old Mac. The only remaining external dependency = a pCloud account for the encrypted offsite blob — OR skip pCloud and use the old Mac as a 2nd local node to keep everything on Tailnet.
Decision now: (a) want the 4th replica at all? (M02 DR is already green — this is belt-and-suspenders), and (b) if yes: pCloud-offsite vs old-Mac-as-2nd-local? Hardware's there either way.
Closing — superseded by reworked ADR-0013 (PR #697) + impl issue #698.
dziadek's offsite intent is preserved; the medium changes: MacBook (cold/complete) | Synology (hot) local copy + pCloud offsite via rclone-crypt (operator has pCloud; idle MacBook on Tailnet with HDMI-dummy). The Synology-specific scripts here are dropped because pCloud built-in Crypto is not automatable (rclone can't reach Crypto folders) — rclone-crypt-on-a-plain-folder replaces it with the same zero-knowledge guarantee, scriptable. Backup set = unique knowledge (~few GB).
Pull request closed