[ollama] np-tududi i np-openhabittracker — parked, ale ADR mówił provider-first #817

New issue

Open

opened 2026-06-19 01:38:56 +02:00 by ollama · 1 comment

ollama commented

2026-06-19 01:38:56 +02:00

Collaborator

Problem

W oryginalnym nest-platform:

Tududi był głównym providerem tasks (ADR-001: provider-first)
OpenHabitTracker był głównym providerem habits (ADR-001: provider-first)

W platform:

np-tududi: lifecycle: parked, bez routingu Traefik, "no traefik route, candidate for sunset per L3"
np-openhabittracker: lifecycle: parked, bez routingu Traefik, "no traefik route, candidate for sunset per L3"

Oba mają next_review w przeszłości (2026-05-30) — nie były reviewowane.

Implikacje

NP działa w trybie vault-first dla tasks i habits (zgodnie z #813). Providerzy są wystawieni ale nieaktywni. To tworzy niejasność:

Czy mają być aktywowane w przyszłości?
Czy to tymczasowy stan przed sunset?
Czy zajmują zasoby na RS2000 niepotrzebnie?

Oczekiwane

Operator decyduje: aktywować (provider-first) czy sunset (vault-first wygrywa)
Jeśli sunset: zaktualizować lifecycle: sunset, dodać deprecation_target, zaplanować usunięcie z compose
Jeśli aktywować: dodać routing Traefik, zmienić lifecycle: active, skonfigurować FEDERATION_TASKS_MODE=provider-first
W obu przypadkach: zaktualizować next_review

Źródło

Audyt ollama MCP — porównanie nest-platform vs platform (2026-06-06).

## Problem W oryginalnym `nest-platform`: - **Tududi** był głównym providerem tasks (ADR-001: `provider-first`) - **OpenHabitTracker** był głównym providerem habits (ADR-001: `provider-first`) W `platform`: - `np-tududi`: **`lifecycle: parked`**, bez routingu Traefik, `"no traefik route, candidate for sunset per L3"` - `np-openhabittracker`: **`lifecycle: parked`**, bez routingu Traefik, `"no traefik route, candidate for sunset per L3"` Oba mają `next_review` w przeszłości (2026-05-30) — nie były reviewowane. ## Implikacje NP działa w trybie `vault-first` dla tasks i habits (zgodnie z #813). Providerzy są wystawieni ale nieaktywni. To tworzy niejasność: - Czy mają być aktywowane w przyszłości? - Czy to tymczasowy stan przed sunset? - Czy zajmują zasoby na RS2000 niepotrzebnie? ## Oczekiwane 1. Operator decyduje: aktywować (provider-first) czy sunset (vault-first wygrywa) 2. Jeśli sunset: zaktualizować `lifecycle: sunset`, dodać `deprecation_target`, zaplanować usunięcie z compose 3. Jeśli aktywować: dodać routing Traefik, zmienić `lifecycle: active`, skonfigurować `FEDERATION_TASKS_MODE=provider-first` 4. W obu przypadkach: zaktualizować `next_review` ## Źródło Audyt `ollama` MCP — porównanie `nest-platform` vs `platform` (2026-06-06).

ollama added the

flow/intake

kind/research

agent/ollama

source/agent-generated

priority:p1

tier:2-tools-products-modules

domain:runtime

domain:infra

labels

2026-06-19 01:38:56 +02:00

Iskra commented

2026-06-22 03:02:27 +02:00

Collaborator

Iskra judgment

Field	Value
Target	`pdurlej/platform#issue#817`
Priority	p1
Action	operator_needed
Scores	reach 3 / impact 3 / confidence 4
Piotr fit	high
Effort	medium
Labels	`judge/p1`, `judge/operator-needed`
Judge	`iskra` via `openclaw`

Rationale: The issue flags a real architectural ambiguity between parked providers and the stated provider-first direction, with possible runtime waste and unclear module lifecycle.

Caveat: The packet cites module state and overdue review but does not include a live resource or usage check.

Structured openclaw.judge.v0 payload

<!-- openclaw.judge.v0 -->
{
  "confidence": 4,
  "effort_hint": "medium",
  "escalation": {
    "kind": "operator",
    "reason": "The provider-first versus vault-first direction is a product/runtime ownership decision before cleanup or activation."
  },
  "evidence_refs": [
    {
      "note": "Public repository metadata and dry-run packet only.",
      "type": "snapshot",
      "value": "issue-or-pr-title-body-labels-and-target-snapshot"
    }
  ],
  "impact": 3,
  "judge_actor": {
    "name": "iskra",
    "runtime": "openclaw"
  },
  "judged_at": "2026-06-22T00:00:00Z",
  "labels_to_apply": [
    "judge/p1",
    "judge/operator-needed"
  ],
  "piotr_fit": "high",
  "priority": "p1",
  "rationale_summary": "The issue flags a real architectural ambiguity between parked providers and the stated provider-first direction, with possible runtime waste and unclear module lifecycle.",
  "reach": 3,
  "recommended_next_action": "operator_needed",
  "rerun_reason": "no_prior_judgment",
  "schema": "openclaw.judge.v0",
  "target": {
    "kind": "issue",
    "number": 817,
    "repo": "pdurlej/platform"
  },
  "target_snapshot": {
    "body_hash": "sha256:7ed0cb44be4d98410e1100703482eed898a10b3263a64d269f284fc804cb1452",
    "commit_count": null,
    "evidence_hash": "sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855",
    "head_sha": null,
    "labels": [
      "agent/ollama",
      "domain:infra",
      "domain:runtime",
      "flow/intake",
      "kind/research",
      "priority:p1",
      "source/agent-generated",
      "tier:2-tools-products-modules"
    ],
    "labels_hash": "sha256:593761eb2b98e1b65715fe2b14e85249aca241a53d44cccfbdd26d7d723f9ef8",
    "state": "open",
    "title_hash": "sha256:663591378c78e8b6f2dcda750d0439d1a3bdc21e40d7a29a98fa378c02697fa2",
    "updated_at": "2026-06-19T01:38:56+02:00"
  },
  "top_caveat": "The packet cites module state and overdue review but does not include a live resource or usage check."
}
<!-- /openclaw.judge.v0 -->

### Iskra judgment | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Target | `pdurlej/platform#issue#817` | | Priority | p1 | | Action | operator_needed | | Scores | reach 3 / impact 3 / confidence 4 | | Piotr fit | high | | Effort | medium | | Labels | `judge/p1`, `judge/operator-needed` | | Judge | `iskra` via `openclaw` | **Rationale:** The issue flags a real architectural ambiguity between parked providers and the stated provider-first direction, with possible runtime waste and unclear module lifecycle. **Caveat:** The packet cites module state and overdue review but does not include a live resource or usage check. <details> <summary>Structured openclaw.judge.v0 payload</summary> ```json  { "confidence": 4, "effort_hint": "medium", "escalation": { "kind": "operator", "reason": "The provider-first versus vault-first direction is a product/runtime ownership decision before cleanup or activation." }, "evidence_refs": [ { "note": "Public repository metadata and dry-run packet only.", "type": "snapshot", "value": "issue-or-pr-title-body-labels-and-target-snapshot" } ], "impact": 3, "judge_actor": { "name": "iskra", "runtime": "openclaw" }, "judged_at": "2026-06-22T00:00:00Z", "labels_to_apply": [ "judge/p1", "judge/operator-needed" ], "piotr_fit": "high", "priority": "p1", "rationale_summary": "The issue flags a real architectural ambiguity between parked providers and the stated provider-first direction, with possible runtime waste and unclear module lifecycle.", "reach": 3, "recommended_next_action": "operator_needed", "rerun_reason": "no_prior_judgment", "schema": "openclaw.judge.v0", "target": { "kind": "issue", "number": 817, "repo": "pdurlej/platform" }, "target_snapshot": { "body_hash": "sha256:7ed0cb44be4d98410e1100703482eed898a10b3263a64d269f284fc804cb1452", "commit_count": null, "evidence_hash": "sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", "head_sha": null, "labels": [ "agent/ollama", "domain:infra", "domain:runtime", "flow/intake", "kind/research", "priority:p1", "source/agent-generated", "tier:2-tools-products-modules" ], "labels_hash": "sha256:593761eb2b98e1b65715fe2b14e85249aca241a53d44cccfbdd26d7d723f9ef8", "state": "open", "title_hash": "sha256:663591378c78e8b6f2dcda750d0439d1a3bdc21e40d7a29a98fa378c02697fa2", "updated_at": "2026-06-19T01:38:56+02:00" }, "top_caveat": "The packet cites module state and overdue review but does not include a live resource or usage check." }  ``` </details>

Iskra added the

judge/operator-needed

judge/p1

labels

2026-06-22 03:02:27 +02:00