Add baseline and fail-on gate #31
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
pdurlej/fallow-ts!31
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "codex/wave3-baseline-and-fail-on"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Canary Context Pack
Product story
Repos need a way to adopt fallow-ts in CI without first fixing every existing finding. Baselines should let known findings pass while still blocking new findings.
What changed
fallow-ts baseline create --root . --output fallow-ts-baseline.json.analyze --baseline <path> --fail-on warning.main()return values actually affect the process.Why it changed
Wave 3 needs CI adoption mechanics before templates can recommend fallow-ts as a deterministic checkpoint.
Files touched
src/baseline.tssrc/cli.tssrc/index.tstests/cli.test.mjsdocs/baseline.mdREADME.mdRuntime evidence
npm run buildnpm testnode dist/cli.js analyze --root . --format json --output /tmp/fallow-ts-report.jsongit diff --checkKnown constraints
Current
--fail-onsupport is intentionally narrow:warning. Baseline files are local JSON only; no remote state.Explicit out-of-scope
No hosted baseline service, no database, no per-rule suppression syntax, no automatic baseline update command.
Requested decision
Approve if existing findings can be baselined without hiding new findings, and CLI exit behavior is correct.
Merge blockers
--fail-on warningshould fail.Closes #15.