docs(prompts): Order A2 master prompt draft (Round-2 cross-review machinery for Codex) #19

Merged
pdurlej merged 1 commit from claude/orders/order-a2-prompt-draft into main 2026-05-02 02:46:03 +02:00
Collaborator

Summary

Drafted by GLM-5.1 sisyphus (oh-my-opencode framework, ULW-LOOP mode) per .sisyphus/plans/order-a2-prompt.md, following prompts/order-c-codex-askpass.md gold standard. 310 lines covering Round-2 cross-review machinery for the 3+3 ensemble pipeline.

Why DRAFT

Pre-Oracle-review draft. Operator pastes prompt to Oracle UI for sanity check before delegation to Codex. Same pattern as Order C prompt PR #11 (Oracle-validated before merge).

Scope (per charter §3 review-by-impact)

Small impact: docs only, single new file (prompts/order-a2-round2-cross-review.md), no behavior change → ensemble review optional. Companion evidence file in .sisyphus/evidence/order-a2-prompt-summary.md.

When Codex implements per this prompt: ~350 LOC code + ~300 LOC tests = medium impact → 3+3 ensemble required at implementation PR.

Linkage

  • Closes (when implementation lands) open loop reviewer-fix-patch-schema step A2 (deadline 2026-05-22)
  • Builds on top of A1 (fix_patch.ops[] schema, PR #18)
  • Defers A3 (bug-class taxonomy, PR forthcoming)
  • Codex implementation must use linked-worktree pattern per charter §4 v2 (PR #15)

Token-arbitrage

GLM-5.1 wrote 310 lines on flat-fee z.ai subscription. Claude orchestrator reviewed + committed (~5k tokens). Estimated savings: 15-20k orchestrator tokens.

Co-authors

  • GLM-5.1 (z.ai sisyphus draft via OpenCode CLI — opencode run -m zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1)
  • Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context, orchestrator review + commit)
## Summary Drafted by **GLM-5.1 sisyphus** (oh-my-opencode framework, ULW-LOOP mode) per `.sisyphus/plans/order-a2-prompt.md`, following `prompts/order-c-codex-askpass.md` gold standard. 310 lines covering Round-2 cross-review machinery for the 3+3 ensemble pipeline. ## Why DRAFT **Pre-Oracle-review draft.** Operator pastes prompt to Oracle UI for sanity check before delegation to Codex. Same pattern as Order C prompt PR #11 (Oracle-validated before merge). ## Scope (per charter §3 review-by-impact) **Small impact**: docs only, single new file (`prompts/order-a2-round2-cross-review.md`), no behavior change → ensemble review optional. Companion evidence file in `.sisyphus/evidence/order-a2-prompt-summary.md`. When Codex implements per this prompt: ~350 LOC code + ~300 LOC tests = **medium impact** → 3+3 ensemble required at implementation PR. ## Linkage - Closes (when implementation lands) open loop `reviewer-fix-patch-schema` step A2 (deadline 2026-05-22) - Builds on top of A1 (`fix_patch.ops[]` schema, PR #18) - Defers A3 (bug-class taxonomy, PR forthcoming) - Codex implementation must use linked-worktree pattern per charter §4 v2 (PR #15) ## Token-arbitrage GLM-5.1 wrote 310 lines on flat-fee z.ai subscription. Claude orchestrator reviewed + committed (~5k tokens). Estimated savings: 15-20k orchestrator tokens. ## Co-authors - GLM-5.1 (z.ai sisyphus draft via OpenCode CLI — `opencode run -m zai-coding-plan/glm-5.1`) - Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context, orchestrator review + commit)
Drafted by GLM-5.1 sisyphus per .sisyphus/plans/order-a2-prompt.md, following
prompts/order-c-codex-askpass.md gold standard. 310 lines covering:
- Round-2 cross-review schema (accept/amend/reject/needs_operator verdicts)
- tools/round2.py module spec (~120 LOC)
- Integration in run_review.py main() after Round-1 ELEVATED decisions
- _ROUND_2_INSTRUCTION system prompt extension in _base.py
- 10+ tests including edge cases
- Bootstrap rule for linked worktree (per charter §4 v2 / Order C-followup)

Pre-Oracle-review draft. Operator pastes to Oracle UI before delegation to Codex.
Same pattern as Order C prompt PR #11 (Oracle-validated before merge).

Per charter §3 review-by-impact: small impact (docs only, single new file,
no behavior change) → ensemble review optional.

Closes (when implementation lands) open loop reviewer-fix-patch-schema step A2
(deadline 2026-05-22).

Co-authored-by: GLM-5.1 (z.ai sisyphus draft via OpenCode CLI)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context, orchestrator review + commit)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
pdurlej/platform!19
No description provided.