docs(w6): record CI required-check guardrails #451

Merged
pdurlej merged 1 commit from codex/w6a-ci-required-checks into main 2026-05-24 22:20:05 +02:00
Collaborator

Canary status: missing — rely on required Forgejo checks before merge

Canary Context Pack

Product story

W6 needs reliable CI/branch-protection evidence before stronger AI review or future semi-autonomous merge policy. This report records what is actually enforced today and what is only advisory PR evidence.

What changed

Added state/reports/w6a-ci-required-checks-2026-05-24.md with read-only evidence from workflow files, CI docs, check_branch_protection.py, and Forgejo PR status APIs.

Why it changed

Fork A's W6a job is to make the current CI guardrail state explicit so the integrator can sequence W6a/W6b/W6c without guessing.

Files touched

  • state/reports/w6a-ci-required-checks-2026-05-24.md

Relevant context

  • W6a / Milestone 06 CI guardrails
  • #243 branch protection owner action
  • #49 old ADR-0002 CI enforcement checklist
  • #449 PR-body reviewer context just landed before this fork started

Runtime evidence

No runtime mutation. Read-only Forgejo API evidence only.

Known constraints

codex cannot read admin branch-protection endpoints (403), but check_branch_protection.py can read the branch payload and confirmed main protection readiness for base-is-main / guard.

Explicit out-of-scope

  • No branch-protection mutation.
  • No required-check changes.
  • No runtime/RS2000 mutation.
  • No state/STATUS_NOW.md edit.

Requested decision

Merge as W6a evidence if checks are green.

Merge blockers

  • Report contradicts live branch-protection readiness.
  • Workflow lint fails.

Spec sources read

  • .forgejo/ci-policy.yaml
  • .forgejo/workflows/base-is-main.yml
  • .forgejo/workflows/workflow-lint.yml
  • .forgejo/workflows/patchwarden-pr-sanity.yml
  • .forgejo/workflows/canary-required.yml
  • .forgejo/workflows/platformctl-plan.yml
  • docs/ci/README.md
  • docs/ci/runner-contract.md
  • docs/forgejo-agent-operations.md
  • runbooks/forgejo-actions-runner.md
  • control-plane/platformctl/ci/check_branch_protection.py
  • Forgejo API read-only: PR #449 status, branch readiness, issues #49/#85/#243

Test plan

  • python3 control-plane/platformctl/ci/lint_workflows.py --policy .forgejo/ci-policy.yaml --workflows .forgejo/workflows --markdown /tmp/w6a-workflow-lint.md --json /tmp/w6a-workflow-lint.json → passed with 0 findings
  • git diff --check → clean

Refs #49
Refs #243

Canary status: missing — rely on required Forgejo checks before merge ## Canary Context Pack ### Product story W6 needs reliable CI/branch-protection evidence before stronger AI review or future semi-autonomous merge policy. This report records what is actually enforced today and what is only advisory PR evidence. ### What changed Added `state/reports/w6a-ci-required-checks-2026-05-24.md` with read-only evidence from workflow files, CI docs, `check_branch_protection.py`, and Forgejo PR status APIs. ### Why it changed Fork A's W6a job is to make the current CI guardrail state explicit so the integrator can sequence W6a/W6b/W6c without guessing. ### Files touched - `state/reports/w6a-ci-required-checks-2026-05-24.md` ### Relevant context - W6a / Milestone 06 CI guardrails - #243 branch protection owner action - #49 old ADR-0002 CI enforcement checklist - #449 PR-body reviewer context just landed before this fork started ### Runtime evidence No runtime mutation. Read-only Forgejo API evidence only. ### Known constraints `codex` cannot read admin branch-protection endpoints (`403`), but `check_branch_protection.py` can read the branch payload and confirmed `main` protection readiness for `base-is-main / guard`. ### Explicit out-of-scope - No branch-protection mutation. - No required-check changes. - No runtime/RS2000 mutation. - No `state/STATUS_NOW.md` edit. ### Requested decision Merge as W6a evidence if checks are green. ### Merge blockers - Report contradicts live branch-protection readiness. - Workflow lint fails. ## Spec sources read - `.forgejo/ci-policy.yaml` - `.forgejo/workflows/base-is-main.yml` - `.forgejo/workflows/workflow-lint.yml` - `.forgejo/workflows/patchwarden-pr-sanity.yml` - `.forgejo/workflows/canary-required.yml` - `.forgejo/workflows/platformctl-plan.yml` - `docs/ci/README.md` - `docs/ci/runner-contract.md` - `docs/forgejo-agent-operations.md` - `runbooks/forgejo-actions-runner.md` - `control-plane/platformctl/ci/check_branch_protection.py` - Forgejo API read-only: PR #449 status, branch readiness, issues #49/#85/#243 ## Test plan - `python3 control-plane/platformctl/ci/lint_workflows.py --policy .forgejo/ci-policy.yaml --workflows .forgejo/workflows --markdown /tmp/w6a-workflow-lint.md --json /tmp/w6a-workflow-lint.json` → passed with 0 findings - `git diff --check` → clean Refs #49 Refs #243
docs(w6): record CI required-check guardrails
All checks were successful
base-is-main / guard (pull_request) Successful in 2s
canary-required / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 5s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 4s
canary-required / canary (pull_request) Has been skipped
patchwarden-pr-sanity / sanity (pull_request) Successful in 23s
9da64116a4
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
pdurlej/platform!451
No description provided.