memory(B): task_run + task_checkpoint + Codex packet templates (highest-impact fix for #17 flow loop) #460
Labels
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
pdurlej/platform#460
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Why this matters (highest ROI of Memory Control Plane)
Per competitive brief + GPT 5.5 Pro consultation + operator's #17 flow loop:
Diagnosis (GPT + claude agreed):
This issue ships A + B + C from that diagnosis. Targets the rescue cycle directly.
What to ship
Schema (main
postgres:16.12-alpine)Templates (markdown w
state/templates/)CODEX_TASK_PACKET.md(per GPT format in strategy doc)CODEX_CHECKPOINT.md(minimal observable state)CLAUDE_RESCUE_PROTOCOL.md(how claude reconstructs Codex state)CLI (jeśli platformctl ready)
platformctl memory checkpoint create --task <id> --kind <kind>(writes to task_checkpoint)platformctl memory brief --task <id>(reads all checkpoints + task_run + entity refs → reconstruction brief)Coupling option (per claude answer Q2)
Start with option (c) no coupling: claude (Pan Herbatka) creates checkpoints in Codex's name based on observable artifacts (PR changes, commit msgs, transcript paste from operator). Zero infra change.
Escalate to option (a) shell wrapper (
platformctl codex-task start/checkpoint/end) whenplatformctlhas the subcommands AND operator wants automation.Acceptance criteria
task_run+task_checkpointtables in main Postgresplatformctl memory checkpoint create+platformctl memory brief --task <id>subcommandsDependencies
Spec sources
state/strategy/memory-control-plane-2026-05-24.mdstate/spike-understand-anything/07-gpt5pro-memory-architecture-brief.mdOut of scope
Tier per ADR-0007: Medium — schema + templates + 1 end-to-end test. Touches main Postgres (W3-tested), no production runtime risk.
M07 triage result: hold. Iskra's metadata-only domain reply recommends prioritizing #357/#459/#461 before task_run/task_checkpoint templates, with reason
prioritize_memory_architecture_before_packet_templates. No runtime mutation was performed.Status correction (claude, from a grounded plan-review) — this is OPEN, and "verify-then-close" must be docs-only.
The X3 plan logs #460 as "verified-then-closed" — factually wrong. Verified live: #460 is OPEN, carries the
proposed(awaiting-human-review) label,codex_ready=false, and its acceptance criteria still include unsatisfied live-Postgres migration items ("Schema migration: task_run + task_checkpoint tables in main Postgres", "Migration runbook").Bound the close step:
Don't close this as a clerical formality while a live-DB AC is unmet. Cleanest: move the migration/runbook AC to #661 (where the gated apply lives) and close #460 on the spec-only AC — or leave it open behind the operator gate.
Closing with evidence — spec deliverable landed.
state/memory/task-run-schema.md(task_run + task_checkpoint contract) +CODEX_TASK_PACKET.md+CODEX_CHECKPOINT.mdonmainvia merged PR #636.Closing on the spec deliverable; the table creation is owned by #688 (close-on-live-verified). Verify-and-close, not close-on-assumption.