chore(w8.0): fill source/artifact metadata for stateful candidate set #505
Labels
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
pdurlej/platform#505
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Spec sources (whitelist)
state/cycle/W8-module-upgrade-prep.md§Current Readiness Snapshot / Wave Plan / Required Evidence Per Upgrade PRstate/cycle/W8-readiness-2026-05-26.md§Readiness Snapshot / Candidate Classificationdecisions/0022-module-source-and-release-boundaries.md§Metadata direction / Pilot rollout / Anti-patternsmodules/minio/module.yamlmodules/redis/module.yamlmodules/postgres/module.yamlExtracted context
Do NOT read (unless escape hatch fires)
compose/— this is metadata-only; compose/env changes are out of scope.config/— no runtime config changes.state/cutover/— cleanup/restore work is adjacent but not part of this metadata batch.Allowed touched paths
modules/minio/module.yaml(modify)modules/redis/module.yaml(modify)modules/postgres/module.yaml(modify)state/cycle/W8-module-upgrade-prep.md(modify, only if adding a short metadata-batch note)Why this exists (product-first)
W8 cannot safely upgrade stateful modules while agents have to infer source and artifact intent from observed runtime strings. This batch makes the next stateful upgrade planning boring: each module declares where its image comes from, what artifact should be tracked, and why updates remain manual.
Why this matters now
W8.0 and W8.1 proved the packet shape, but broad upgrades remain blocked by sparse metadata.
minio,redis, andpostgresare core/stateful enough that they should have explicit metadata before any W8.3 or W8.final work tries to reason about them.What "done" looks like
minio,redis, andpostgreseach havespec.sourceandspec.artifactmatching their observed image family/tag.manualunless the PR gives a defensible reason otherwise).PYTHONPATH=control-plane python3 -m platformctl.cli validate all --jsonexits with zero failures.Scope
In scope:
Out of scope:
Suggested approach
spec.runtime.image_observedimage family/tag.upstream-image,upstream-tag,oci-image,upstream-registry.Escape hatch
If an observed image cannot be cleanly mapped to source/artifact metadata, stop and comment on #389 with the gap. Do not invent metadata to satisfy the checklist.
Unknowns / owner questions
Risk class
risk/runtime— metadata affects future upgrade decisions for stateful modulesrisk/process— agents use this metadata for W8 routingrisk/exposurerisk/productClass of service
class/security-sensitiveTrace