state(roadmap): consolidate current platform milestones #386

Merged
pdurlej merged 1 commit from codex/roadmap/current-platform-milestones into main 2026-05-19 08:52:21 +02:00
Collaborator

Canary status: missing - roadmap/state-only PR; rely on required Forgejo checks before merge

Canary Context Pack

Product story

The operator needs one visible, current platform roadmap instead of several overlapping historical plans (Phase 01-06, F1/F2/F3, cutoff soak, Honcho closeout, ADR-0020/21/22). Forgejo milestones should become the communication layer for stages and tasks.

What changed

  • Added state/roadmap/current-platform-roadmap.md as the active durable roadmap.
  • Updated state/STATUS_NOW.md to point at the roadmap and milestone train.
  • Created Forgejo milestones 01 through 09 and assigned existing open issues into the new buckets.

Why it changed

After ADR-0022 merged, the old plans no longer explain the true next sequence. This PR consolidates them and makes milestones the operator-facing stage board.

Files touched

  • state/roadmap/current-platform-roadmap.md
  • state/STATUS_NOW.md

Relevant context

  • ADR-0020: post-soak cleanup and modularization boundary
  • ADR-0021: DDD bounded contexts
  • ADR-0022: module source/release boundaries
  • Issue #384: ProgramBench-style agent-readiness audit
  • Current RS2000 cutoff/F3 evidence in state/STATUS_NOW.md

Runtime evidence

No production mutation. Forgejo planning mutation only: milestones created and existing issues assigned.

Known constraints

Milestones are planning state. They do not authorize production mutation, destructive cleanup, broad upgrades, repo splits, or embedding migration.

Explicit out-of-scope

  • Creating all follow-up meta issues if Forgejo API is unavailable
  • Running cleanup or DR commands
  • Closing stale issues
  • Changing module schema
  • Starting module upgrades

Requested decision

Approve the roadmap as the new planning source of truth and use Forgejo milestones for the next platform phase.

Merge blockers

Block if the milestone order misrepresents operator priorities, if old plans should remain active, or if any milestone groups unsafe work before DR/metadata gates.

Spec sources read

  • state/STATUS_NOW.md - current operator state
  • state/cutover/rs2000-control-plane-cutoff.md - cutoff contract
  • state/cutover/rs2000-post-soak-legacy-cleanup.md - post-soak cleanup plan
  • state/cutover/honcho-closeout-plan.md - Honcho closeout state
  • decisions/0020-post-soak-legacy-cleanup-and-platform-modularization.md - cleanup/modularization decision
  • decisions/0021-ddd-bounded-contexts-for-platform-monorepo.md - internal bounded-context plan
  • decisions/0022-module-source-and-release-boundaries.md - source/artifact boundary plan
  • Forgejo open issues and milestones via API

Refs #384.

Canary status: missing - roadmap/state-only PR; rely on required Forgejo checks before merge ## Canary Context Pack ### Product story The operator needs one visible, current platform roadmap instead of several overlapping historical plans (Phase 01-06, F1/F2/F3, cutoff soak, Honcho closeout, ADR-0020/21/22). Forgejo milestones should become the communication layer for stages and tasks. ### What changed - Added `state/roadmap/current-platform-roadmap.md` as the active durable roadmap. - Updated `state/STATUS_NOW.md` to point at the roadmap and milestone train. - Created Forgejo milestones `01` through `09` and assigned existing open issues into the new buckets. ### Why it changed After ADR-0022 merged, the old plans no longer explain the true next sequence. This PR consolidates them and makes milestones the operator-facing stage board. ### Files touched - `state/roadmap/current-platform-roadmap.md` - `state/STATUS_NOW.md` ### Relevant context - ADR-0020: post-soak cleanup and modularization boundary - ADR-0021: DDD bounded contexts - ADR-0022: module source/release boundaries - Issue #384: ProgramBench-style agent-readiness audit - Current RS2000 cutoff/F3 evidence in `state/STATUS_NOW.md` ### Runtime evidence No production mutation. Forgejo planning mutation only: milestones created and existing issues assigned. ### Known constraints Milestones are planning state. They do not authorize production mutation, destructive cleanup, broad upgrades, repo splits, or embedding migration. ### Explicit out-of-scope - Creating all follow-up meta issues if Forgejo API is unavailable - Running cleanup or DR commands - Closing stale issues - Changing module schema - Starting module upgrades ### Requested decision Approve the roadmap as the new planning source of truth and use Forgejo milestones for the next platform phase. ### Merge blockers Block if the milestone order misrepresents operator priorities, if old plans should remain active, or if any milestone groups unsafe work before DR/metadata gates. ## Spec sources read - `state/STATUS_NOW.md` - current operator state - `state/cutover/rs2000-control-plane-cutoff.md` - cutoff contract - `state/cutover/rs2000-post-soak-legacy-cleanup.md` - post-soak cleanup plan - `state/cutover/honcho-closeout-plan.md` - Honcho closeout state - `decisions/0020-post-soak-legacy-cleanup-and-platform-modularization.md` - cleanup/modularization decision - `decisions/0021-ddd-bounded-contexts-for-platform-monorepo.md` - internal bounded-context plan - `decisions/0022-module-source-and-release-boundaries.md` - source/artifact boundary plan - Forgejo open issues and milestones via API Refs #384.
state(roadmap): consolidate platform milestones
All checks were successful
base-is-main / guard (pull_request) Successful in 1s
canary-required / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 4s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 4s
canary-required / canary (pull_request) Has been skipped
patchwarden-pr-sanity / sanity (pull_request) Successful in 19s
d33ec094da
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
pdurlej/platform!386
No description provided.