fix(ci): skip merged-pr lookup for deferred auto-apply #425

Closed
codex wants to merge 0 commits from codex/fix/auto-apply-skip-pr-lookup-when-deferred into main
Collaborator

Canary status: missing — rely on required Forgejo checks before merge

Canary Context Pack

Product story

Stateful/sidecar-only main pushes should defer to manual backup-backed dispatch without leaving a red auto-apply signal. Real production apply still needs a merged PR binding before platformctl apply runs.

What changed

  • Move merged-PR resolution after auto-apply scope classification.
  • Skip merged-PR lookup when there are no auto-apply eligible modules.
  • Add a workflow contract assertion for the deferred path.

Why it changed

PRs #423/#424 were merged through a normal git merge commit because Forgejo API merge returned 405. The auto-apply job failed before scope handling because merged-PR lookup ran too early, even though the stateful push should have been a no-op/deferred path.

Files touched

  • .forgejo/workflows/platformctl-auto-apply.yml
  • control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_forgejo_ci_scripts_contract.py

Runtime evidence

Local tests:

  • python3 -m pytest control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_forgejo_ci_scripts_contract.py -q → 38 passed
  • python3 -m pytest tests/test_l4_verify.py::test_yaml_syntax_valid -q → 102 passed
  • git diff --check → clean

Known constraints

This does not make direct pushes acceptable for real apply. If modules are eligible for apply, find_merged_pr.py still runs and must bind the apply to a merged PR object.

Explicit out-of-scope

No production restart, no module changes, no runner config changes.

Requested decision

Merge after checks are green.

Merge blockers

Any workflow lint or platformctl contract failure.

Spec sources read

  • .forgejo/workflows/platformctl-auto-apply.yml — failing workflow order
  • control-plane/platformctl/ci/find_merged_pr.py — merged PR lookup semantics
  • control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_forgejo_ci_scripts_contract.py — CI contract coverage
Canary status: missing — rely on required Forgejo checks before merge ## Canary Context Pack ### Product story Stateful/sidecar-only main pushes should defer to manual backup-backed dispatch without leaving a red auto-apply signal. Real production apply still needs a merged PR binding before platformctl apply runs. ### What changed - Move merged-PR resolution after auto-apply scope classification. - Skip merged-PR lookup when there are no auto-apply eligible modules. - Add a workflow contract assertion for the deferred path. ### Why it changed PRs #423/#424 were merged through a normal git merge commit because Forgejo API merge returned 405. The auto-apply job failed before scope handling because merged-PR lookup ran too early, even though the stateful push should have been a no-op/deferred path. ### Files touched - `.forgejo/workflows/platformctl-auto-apply.yml` - `control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_forgejo_ci_scripts_contract.py` ### Runtime evidence Local tests: - `python3 -m pytest control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_forgejo_ci_scripts_contract.py -q` → 38 passed - `python3 -m pytest tests/test_l4_verify.py::test_yaml_syntax_valid -q` → 102 passed - `git diff --check` → clean ### Known constraints This does not make direct pushes acceptable for real apply. If modules are eligible for apply, `find_merged_pr.py` still runs and must bind the apply to a merged PR object. ### Explicit out-of-scope No production restart, no module changes, no runner config changes. ### Requested decision Merge after checks are green. ### Merge blockers Any workflow lint or platformctl contract failure. ## Spec sources read - `.forgejo/workflows/platformctl-auto-apply.yml` — failing workflow order - `control-plane/platformctl/ci/find_merged_pr.py` — merged PR lookup semantics - `control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_forgejo_ci_scripts_contract.py` — CI contract coverage
fix(ci): skip merged-pr lookup for deferred auto-apply
All checks were successful
base-is-main / guard (pull_request) Successful in 1s
canary-required / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 5s
infra-docs-drift / docs-drift (pull_request) Successful in 4s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 4s
platformctl plan / auto-apply scope (pull_request) Successful in 21s
pyfallow / Pyfallow gate (control-plane) (pull_request) Successful in 19s
python-ci / Python 3.11 (pull_request) Successful in 40s
python-ci / Python 3.12 (pull_request) Successful in 41s
python-ci / Python 3.13 (pull_request) Successful in 41s
workflow-lint / lint (pull_request) Successful in 6s
canary-required / canary (pull_request) Successful in 13s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / sanity (pull_request) Successful in 21s
46cd965f3f
Author
Collaborator

Closed after verified git merge commit abe8433b8c reached main. Forgejo merge API returned 405 during this maintenance path, so codex used a normal non-force merge push; follow-up CI fixes #425/#427/#428 preserve guarded fallback semantics.

Closed after verified git merge commit abe8433b8c3dc7399c9319bf4dbd46aec74f7718 reached main. Forgejo merge API returned 405 during this maintenance path, so codex used a normal non-force merge push; follow-up CI fixes #425/#427/#428 preserve guarded fallback semantics.
codex closed this pull request 2026-05-24 15:48:25 +02:00
All checks were successful
base-is-main / guard (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Required
Details
canary-required / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 5s
infra-docs-drift / docs-drift (pull_request) Successful in 4s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 4s
platformctl plan / auto-apply scope (pull_request) Successful in 21s
pyfallow / Pyfallow gate (control-plane) (pull_request) Successful in 19s
python-ci / Python 3.11 (pull_request) Successful in 40s
python-ci / Python 3.12 (pull_request) Successful in 41s
python-ci / Python 3.13 (pull_request) Successful in 41s
workflow-lint / lint (pull_request) Successful in 6s
canary-required / canary (pull_request) Successful in 13s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / sanity (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Required
Details

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
pdurlej/platform!425
No description provided.