fix(ci): scope Patchwarden sanity artifacts per PR #621

Merged
pdurlej merged 1 commit from codex/patchwarden-unique-artifacts into main 2026-05-30 02:11:05 +02:00
Collaborator

Canary status: missing - fire canary 3+3 manually before merge

Summary

Fixes Patchwarden PR sanity artifact scoping so the sanity job downloads the diff/body artifact produced for the same pull request and head SHA, instead of a stale artifact with the same shared name from another PR.

Why

PR #619 failed Patchwarden sanity because the downloaded input artifact contained PR #581 data and an empty file list/diff. The workflow used a static artifact name, which is unsafe when multiple runs share the same artifact name.

What changed

  • Scope the input artifact name to pull request number and head SHA.
  • Add a regression test that prevents returning to the static artifact name.

Validation

  • UV_CACHE_DIR=/private/tmp/uv-cache PYTHONPATH=control-plane uv run --project control-plane pytest -q control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_pr_sanity.py => 25 passed
  • UV_CACHE_DIR=/private/tmp/uv-cache PYTHONPATH=control-plane uv run --project control-plane python -m platformctl.cli validate all --json => exitCode 0
  • git diff --check => pass

Spec sources read

  • docs/forgejo-agent-operations.md
  • .forgejo/workflows/patchwarden-pr-sanity.yml
  • control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_pr_sanity.py

Non-goals

  • Does not weaken Patchwarden.
  • Does not bypass checks for #619.
  • Does not touch runtime, secrets, Vault, or deployment state.
Canary status: missing - fire canary 3+3 manually before merge ## Summary Fixes Patchwarden PR sanity artifact scoping so the sanity job downloads the diff/body artifact produced for the same pull request and head SHA, instead of a stale artifact with the same shared name from another PR. ## Why PR #619 failed Patchwarden sanity because the downloaded input artifact contained PR #581 data and an empty file list/diff. The workflow used a static artifact name, which is unsafe when multiple runs share the same artifact name. ## What changed - Scope the input artifact name to pull request number and head SHA. - Add a regression test that prevents returning to the static artifact name. ## Validation - `UV_CACHE_DIR=/private/tmp/uv-cache PYTHONPATH=control-plane uv run --project control-plane pytest -q control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_pr_sanity.py` => 25 passed - `UV_CACHE_DIR=/private/tmp/uv-cache PYTHONPATH=control-plane uv run --project control-plane python -m platformctl.cli validate all --json` => exitCode 0 - `git diff --check` => pass ## Spec sources read - `docs/forgejo-agent-operations.md` - `.forgejo/workflows/patchwarden-pr-sanity.yml` - `control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_pr_sanity.py` ## Non-goals - Does not weaken Patchwarden. - Does not bypass checks for #619. - Does not touch runtime, secrets, Vault, or deployment state.
fix(ci): scope patchwarden sanity artifacts per PR
All checks were successful
canary-required / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 5s
infra-docs-drift / docs-drift (pull_request) Successful in 5s
patchwarden-client-dry-run / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 4s
platformctl plan / auto-apply scope (pull_request) Successful in 23s
pyfallow / Pyfallow gate (control-plane) (pull_request) Successful in 22s
python-ci / Python 3.11 (pull_request) Successful in 42s
python-ci / Python 3.12 (pull_request) Successful in 42s
python-ci / Python 3.13 (pull_request) Successful in 42s
workflow-lint / lint (pull_request) Successful in 5s
canary-required / canary (pull_request) Successful in 13s
patchwarden-client-dry-run / dry-run (pull_request) Successful in 22s
base-is-main / guard (pull_request) Successful in 2s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 5s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / sanity (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
e4388bae61
Author
Collaborator

Patchwarden PR sanity

  • Status: eligible_sanity_clean
  • PR: 621
  • Commit: 69540a6ce371212e3a66e85bd99949f388da10e7
  • Security-sensitive label: present
  • Authority: advisory model review plus deterministic blockers only
  • 3+3 canary: still alive; this does not replace it

Deterministic findings

  • info sensitive-path-touched Sensitive path touched — .forgejo/workflows/patchwarden-pr-sanity.yml
    • Evidence: .forgejo/workflows/patchwarden-pr-sanity.yml
    • Next: Route through the existing 3+3/risk-tier process; model review remains advisory.

Model reviewers

global-glm / glm-5.1:cloud

  • Status: ok
  • Verdict: OK
  • Findings: none

global-deepseek / deepseek-v4-pro:cloud

  • Status: ok

  • Verdict: OK

  • low Artifact name depends on PR context; may break on non-PR triggers

    • Evidence: Changed file .forgejo/workflows/patchwarden-pr-sanity.yml: artifact name now uses github.event.pull_request.number and head.sha. If the workflow is triggered by a non-pull_request event (e.g., workflow_dispatch), these values will be empty,
    • Next: Ensure the workflow trigger is restricted to pull_request events, or add a fallback for non-PR contexts.

redteam / kimi-k2.6:cloud

  • Status: ok
  • Verdict: OK
  • Findings: none

Policy notes

  • GLM 5.1 + DeepSeek V4 Pro are the operator-required model mix for this bot.
  • Optional red-team model is enabled only when PLATFORMCTL_PR_SANITY_REDTEAM_MODEL is configured.
  • Auto-merge is not enabled here.
<!-- patchwarden-pr-sanity:pdurlej/platform:PR-621 --> # Patchwarden PR sanity - Status: `eligible_sanity_clean` - PR: `621` - Commit: `69540a6ce371212e3a66e85bd99949f388da10e7` - Security-sensitive label: `present` - Authority: advisory model review plus deterministic blockers only - 3+3 canary: still alive; this does not replace it ## Deterministic findings - **`info` `sensitive-path-touched`** Sensitive path touched — `.forgejo/workflows/patchwarden-pr-sanity.yml` - Evidence: `.forgejo/workflows/patchwarden-pr-sanity.yml` - Next: Route through the existing 3+3/risk-tier process; model review remains advisory. ## Model reviewers ### `global-glm` / `glm-5.1:cloud` - Status: `ok` - Verdict: `OK` - Findings: none ### `global-deepseek` / `deepseek-v4-pro:cloud` - Status: `ok` - Verdict: `OK` - **`low`** Artifact name depends on PR context; may break on non-PR triggers - Evidence: `Changed file .forgejo/workflows/patchwarden-pr-sanity.yml: artifact name now uses github.event.pull_request.number and head.sha. If the workflow is triggered by a non-pull_request event (e.g., workflow_dispatch), these values will be empty,` - Next: Ensure the workflow trigger is restricted to pull_request events, or add a fallback for non-PR contexts. ### `redteam` / `kimi-k2.6:cloud` - Status: `ok` - Verdict: `OK` - Findings: none ## Policy notes - GLM 5.1 + DeepSeek V4 Pro are the operator-required model mix for this bot. - Optional red-team model is enabled only when `PLATFORMCTL_PR_SANITY_REDTEAM_MODEL` is configured. - Auto-merge is not enabled here.
pdurlej approved these changes 2026-05-30 02:01:17 +02:00
pdurlej left a comment

Operator-delegated approval via temporary admin PAT. Checks are green; Patchwarden model reviewers OK; this PR only scopes Patchwarden artifacts per PR/head SHA and is non-runtime/non-destructive.

Operator-delegated approval via temporary admin PAT. Checks are green; Patchwarden model reviewers OK; this PR only scopes Patchwarden artifacts per PR/head SHA and is non-runtime/non-destructive.
codex force-pushed codex/patchwarden-unique-artifacts from e4388bae61
All checks were successful
canary-required / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 5s
infra-docs-drift / docs-drift (pull_request) Successful in 5s
patchwarden-client-dry-run / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 4s
platformctl plan / auto-apply scope (pull_request) Successful in 23s
pyfallow / Pyfallow gate (control-plane) (pull_request) Successful in 22s
python-ci / Python 3.11 (pull_request) Successful in 42s
python-ci / Python 3.12 (pull_request) Successful in 42s
python-ci / Python 3.13 (pull_request) Successful in 42s
workflow-lint / lint (pull_request) Successful in 5s
canary-required / canary (pull_request) Successful in 13s
patchwarden-client-dry-run / dry-run (pull_request) Successful in 22s
base-is-main / guard (pull_request) Successful in 2s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 5s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / sanity (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
to 69540a6ce3
All checks were successful
platformctl plan / auto-apply scope (pull_request) Successful in 24s
pyfallow / Pyfallow gate (control-plane) (pull_request) Successful in 23s
python-ci / Python 3.11 (pull_request) Successful in 45s
base-is-main / guard (pull_request) Successful in 2s
canary-required / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 6s
infra-docs-drift / docs-drift (pull_request) Successful in 6s
patchwarden-client-dry-run / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 5s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / collect-diff (pull_request) Successful in 5s
python-ci / Python 3.12 (pull_request) Successful in 46s
python-ci / Python 3.13 (pull_request) Successful in 45s
workflow-lint / lint (pull_request) Successful in 6s
canary-required / canary (pull_request) Successful in 15s
patchwarden-pr-sanity / sanity (pull_request) Successful in 2m18s
patchwarden-client-dry-run / dry-run (pull_request) Successful in 23s
2026-05-30 02:02:04 +02:00
Compare
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
pdurlej/platform!621
No description provided.