fix(m08): add safe product fences #680
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
pdurlej/platform!680
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "codex/m08-safe-bug-batch"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Canary status: missing - fire canary 3+3 manually before merge
Summary
This PR is the M08 safe bug/product batch. It keeps the scope plan-only and read-only for runtime systems: no live deploy, no live Postgres apply, no issue/comment writer, and no runtime mutation.
Closes #646.
Closes #634.
Closes #290 for the static/data-contract dashboard slice; live route activation and ingestion remain explicitly out of scope.
Canary Context Pack
Product story
M08 needs safer product/runtime follow-through before deeper Iskra/OpenClaw work: user-facing errors should not leak raw tool paths, OpenClaw deploys should not be mistaken for activation, and the 8 bogactw dashboard needs a concrete data contract before UI/runtime wiring.
What changed
chown/chmodfrom the Things sync worker path; ownership must be prepared outside the worker.validate_deploy_plan.pyand the vps1000 deploy workflow.bogactw.v0JSON schema, sanitized sample fixture, and runbook for the static dashboard data contract.Why it changed
Claude flagged these as the safe M08 batch: fix the P1 leak class, prevent build-vs-activate confusion, and land a first static/product slice without live deployment.
Files touched
.forgejo/workflows/deploy-vps1000.ymlcontrol-plane/platformctl/ci/validate_deploy_plan.pycontrol-plane/platformctl/tests/test_forgejo_ci_scripts_contract.pyscripts/iskra-things-sync/iskra_things_sync.pytests/test_iskra_things_sync_contract.pyschema/bogactw.schema.jsonfixtures/bogactw-sample.jsontests/test_bogactw_contract.pyrunbooks/deploy-vps1000.mdrunbooks/iskra-8-bogactw-dashboard.mdmodules/iskra-things-sync/runbook.mdRelevant context
docs/specs/iskra-8-bogactw-dashboard-v0/03-tasks.mdstate/L4/rfc-decisions.jsonrunbooks/deploy-vps1000.mdmodules/iskra-things-sync/runbook.mdRuntime evidence
No runtime mutation was performed. Local verification:
uv run pytest ../tests/test_iskra_things_sync_contract.py ../tests/test_bogactw_contract.py platformctl/tests/test_forgejo_ci_scripts_contract.py-> 75 passedPYTHONPATH=control-plane uv run --project control-plane python -m platformctl.cli validate all --json-> exitCode 0python3 -m py_compile scripts/iskra-things-sync/iskra_things_sync.py control-plane/platformctl/ci/validate_deploy_plan.py-> passedgit diff --check-> cleanKnown constraints
The 8 bogactw work is the static/data-contract slice only. It does not add the live dashboard route, Obsidian ingestion, Iskra memory write-back, or any automatic notification.
Explicit out-of-scope
Requested decision
Review and merge if the safe fences are acceptable.
Merge blockers
Spec sources read
scripts/iskra-things-sync/iskra_things_sync.py- Things/vault write pathtests/test_iskra_things_sync_contract.py- regression coveragecontrol-plane/platformctl/ci/validate_deploy_plan.py- deploy plan validatorcontrol-plane/platformctl/tests/test_forgejo_ci_scripts_contract.py- CI contract coveragerunbooks/deploy-vps1000.md- deploy policymodules/iskra-things-sync/runbook.md- Things worker policydocs/specs/iskra-8-bogactw-dashboard-v0/03-tasks.md- dashboard data-contract scopestate/L4/rfc-decisions.json- existing value-area code contractPatchwarden PR sanity
advisory_findings6807c6269d1442834fc6da97ec153e9eabd80a4608apresentDeterministic findings
infosensitive-path-touchedSensitive path touched —.forgejo/workflows/deploy-vps1000.yml.forgejo/workflows/deploy-vps1000.ymlinfosensitive-path-touchedSensitive path touched —schema/bogactw.schema.jsonschema/bogactw.schema.jsonModel reviewers
global-glm/glm-5.1:cloudokOKglobal-deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:cloudStatus:
okVerdict:
NOT_OKhighIncomplete sanitization of vault artifact write failuresscripts/iskra-things-sync/iskra_things_sync.py:write_receiptcallswrite_vault_text(sanitized) thenmark_vault_file(unsanitized).mark_vault_fileperformsos.utime(path, None)which can raise OSError containing the raw path. Thmark_vault_filein a try/except that raisesVaultArtifactWriteErroror sanitize the error intry_write_receiptbefore logging.mediumActivation receipt can be forged by workflow dispatcher.forgejo/workflows/deploy-vps1000.yml acceptsactivation_receiptas a user-supplied input string.control-plane/platformctl/ci/validate_deploy_plan.pyloads and trusts this JSON without any cryptographic signature or provenance check. AlowBreaking change in iskra-things-sync may cause permission errors in existing environmentsscripts/iskra-things-sync/iskra_things_sync.py:make_vault_sync_visibleno longer performschown/chmod. If the script is run without pre-configured directory ownership, subsequent writes may fail with permission errors (now sanitized,redteam/kimi-k2.6:cloudStatus:
okVerdict:
NOT_OKblockerWorkflow input interpolation allows shell injection and arbitrary file overwrite.forgejo/workflows/deploy-vps1000.yml introduces activation_receipt input (lines 26-29) and interpolates it directly into a bash array: activation_args=(--activation-receipt \"${{ inputs.activation_receipt }}\") which is then expanded intoPolicy notes
PLATFORMCTL_PR_SANITY_REDTEAM_MODELis configured.