chore(actions): inventory Forgejo task volumes #805
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
pdurlej/platform!805
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "codex/issues/801-actions-task-volume-ttl"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Canary status: missing — fire canary 3+3 manually before merge
Canary Context Pack
Product story
RS2000 disk hygiene should distinguish rebuildable CI temp volume cleanup candidates from persistent app data. The operator needs a dry-run inventory that names only Forgejo Actions task volumes, shows age/size/reason, and keeps deletion behind a separate explicit approval.
What changed
forgejo-actions-volumestoscripts/host-ops/docker_disk_policy.py.FORGEJO-ACTIONS-TASK-<n>_WORKFLOW-<workflow>_JOB-<job>matches with age, Docker-reported size, eligibility, and reason.--executeis accepted but refuses with exit code 7; no live deletion path is implemented.Why it changed
#801 came from the RS2000 reclaimables classification: Forgejo Actions task volumes are plausible CI-temp reclaimables, but broad
docker volume pruneis unsafe because Docker volumes include persistent app data and rollback material.Files touched
scripts/host-ops/docker_disk_policy.pytests/test_host_ops_docker_disk_policy.pyrunbooks/rs2000-disk-hygiene.mdrunbooks/forgejo-actions-runner.mdRelevant context
state/reports/rs2000-docker-reclaimables-classification-2026-06-17.mdrunbooks/rs2000-disk-hygiene.mdrunbooks/forgejo-actions-runner.mdRuntime evidence
Read-only live dry-run on RS2000, without installing the file:
Result summary:
candidate_count=2,matching_count=4,ignored_count=88,errors=[]. Two oldFORGEJO-ACTIONS-TASK-1613...volumes were eligible by TTL; two currentFORGEJO-ACTIONS-TASK-9770...volumes were too new. No deletion was executed.Known constraints
docker volume pruneremains prohibited.Explicit out-of-scope
Requested decision
Approve the dry-run inventory and runbook policy. Future deletion remains a separate operator-approved runtime action.
Merge blockers
docker volume prune.Spec sources read
state/reports/rs2000-docker-reclaimables-classification-2026-06-17.mdrunbooks/rs2000-disk-hygiene.mdrunbooks/forgejo-actions-runner.mdscripts/host-ops/docker_disk_policy.py— implementation targettests/test_host_ops_docker_disk_policy.py— existing test targetVerification
Results: host-ops tests
14 passed; execute refusal emittedrefused=trueand exited7;git diff --checkpassed.Closes #801
Merge evidence note before operator-authorized self-merge:
python3 -m pytest tests/test_host_ops_docker_disk_policy.py -q->14 passed.forgejo-actions-volumes --execute --jsonrefuses deletion with exit7andrefused=true.git diff --checkpassed.candidate_count=2,matching_count=4,ignored_count=88,errors=[]; no deletion executed and persistent volumes were outside the selector.Waiting to runbecause the shared Docker runner is currently processingpdurlej/fallow-pytasks, not because this PR has failing checks.This merge does not perform runtime mutation. Future live deletion of any listed volume remains a separate explicit operator approval.
Patchwarden PR sanity
eligible_sanity_clean805d36a141b4b6a481d37963b1c8c19cd02054ed4ccmissingDeterministic findings
No deterministic findings.
Model reviewers
global-glm/glm-5.1:cloudokOKglobal-deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro:cloudStatus:
okVerdict:
ABSTAINblockerMissing diff prevents review of changed filesThe diff section in the review request is empty; no code changes are visible for the four files listed in the PR description.redteam/kimi-k2.6:cloudokOKPolicy notes
PLATFORMCTL_PR_SANITY_REDTEAM_MODELis configured.