chore(verify): clean up active prompt cross-link debt #138

Closed
opened 2026-05-10 00:06:54 +02:00 by codex · 0 comments
Collaborator

Context

Packet M for #122 intentionally handles prompt token-budget waivers and prompt archival first. While implementing it, Codex re-ran the L4 cross-link scan and found remaining missing literal relative paths in active prompts/*.md.

This issue tracks cross-link cleanup separately so #122 does not rewrite active/historical prompt content in the same PR.

Scope

  • Review each missing literal path from active prompts/*.md.
  • Decide whether it is:
    • a real broken repo link to fix,
    • a planned output reference that should be explicitly marked as generated/non-literal,
    • an external-repo reference that should use a full URL,
    • or an archived prompt reference that should point into prompts/archive/....
  • Remove cross-link waivers from tests/l4-verify-waivers.yaml after cleanup.

Current findings from Codex #122 retry

CROSSLINK prompts/01-freeze.md: 10 missing unique paths
CROSSLINK prompts/01.5-schema-v2-adhd-counters.md: 1 missing unique path
CROSSLINK prompts/02-catalog.md: 7 missing unique paths
CROSSLINK prompts/03-control.md: 3 missing unique paths
CROSSLINK prompts/04-observability.md: 4 missing unique paths
CROSSLINK prompts/05-agent-execution.md: 2 missing unique paths
CROSSLINK prompts/06-prune.md: 2 missing unique paths
CROSSLINK prompts/codex-cleanup-122-124-2026-05-09.md: 12 missing unique paths before generated files in #122
CROSSLINK prompts/codex-night-close-2026-05-09.md: 7 missing unique paths
CROSSLINK prompts/codex-platform-final-dispatch-2026-05-09.md: 2 missing unique paths
CROSSLINK prompts/codex-wave-2-v2-cataloging-2026-05-09.md: 2 missing unique paths

Acceptance criteria

  • tests/test_l4_verify.py::test_prompt_literal_cross_links_exist passes without cross-link waivers for active prompts.
  • Planned/generated references are either excluded by test logic with a clear rule or marked in prompt text so they are not mistaken for existing files.
  • Archived prompt references are updated to their archive paths or documented as historical-only.
## Context Packet M for #122 intentionally handles prompt token-budget waivers and prompt archival first. While implementing it, Codex re-ran the L4 cross-link scan and found remaining missing literal relative paths in active `prompts/*.md`. This issue tracks cross-link cleanup separately so #122 does not rewrite active/historical prompt content in the same PR. ## Scope - Review each missing literal path from active `prompts/*.md`. - Decide whether it is: - a real broken repo link to fix, - a planned output reference that should be explicitly marked as generated/non-literal, - an external-repo reference that should use a full URL, - or an archived prompt reference that should point into `prompts/archive/...`. - Remove cross-link waivers from `tests/l4-verify-waivers.yaml` after cleanup. ## Current findings from Codex #122 retry ```text CROSSLINK prompts/01-freeze.md: 10 missing unique paths CROSSLINK prompts/01.5-schema-v2-adhd-counters.md: 1 missing unique path CROSSLINK prompts/02-catalog.md: 7 missing unique paths CROSSLINK prompts/03-control.md: 3 missing unique paths CROSSLINK prompts/04-observability.md: 4 missing unique paths CROSSLINK prompts/05-agent-execution.md: 2 missing unique paths CROSSLINK prompts/06-prune.md: 2 missing unique paths CROSSLINK prompts/codex-cleanup-122-124-2026-05-09.md: 12 missing unique paths before generated files in #122 CROSSLINK prompts/codex-night-close-2026-05-09.md: 7 missing unique paths CROSSLINK prompts/codex-platform-final-dispatch-2026-05-09.md: 2 missing unique paths CROSSLINK prompts/codex-wave-2-v2-cataloging-2026-05-09.md: 2 missing unique paths ``` ## Acceptance criteria - `tests/test_l4_verify.py::test_prompt_literal_cross_links_exist` passes without cross-link waivers for active prompts. - Planned/generated references are either excluded by test logic with a clear rule or marked in prompt text so they are not mistaken for existing files. - Archived prompt references are updated to their archive paths or documented as historical-only.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
pdurlej/platform#138
No description provided.