deslop(ci): pipefail on deploy paths + standardize FORGEJO_OUTPUT + lint guard #729
Labels
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
pdurlej/platform#729
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
From the 2026-06-05 deslop audit. CI enforcement is genuinely good (not theater) — these two harden the production-deploy paths + lock the pattern.
1. Add
-o pipefailto the deploy-host run-blocks (production safety)5
set -eurun-blocks across.forgejo/workflows/platformctl-auto-apply.yml+.forgejo/workflows/release-root-promote.ymllack pipefail → a failing left-of-pipe command can be masked on the production auto-apply/promote paths. Standardize onset -euo pipefail. (The auto-apply loop already does manual exit-code capture, so adding pipefail is safe.)2. Standardize step-output writes + add a lint guard
4 workflows write bare
$GITHUB_OUTPUT(verified):base-is-main.yml,w8-uptime-kuma-runtime-pilot.yml,merged-in-main-audit.yml,platformctl-auto-apply.yml→ change to${FORGEJO_OUTPUT:-$GITHUB_OUTPUT}(matches canary-required.yml / patchwarden-client-dry-run.yml). Then add a rule tocontrol-plane/platformctl/ci/lint_workflows.pyflagging bare$GITHUB_OUTPUTso it can't regress.Acceptance
set -euo pipefail.$GITHUB_OUTPUT; lint_workflows.py fails on a reintroduced bare form (add a test).Authored from the deslop audit (claude). Execution = Codex.
Role: executor
Intent: execute
Needs owner: no
Picking up as codex for issue #729. Scope: repo-local CI/workflow hardening only; no runtime mutation, no deploy, no runner restart, no secret reads. Because this touches deploy workflow trust boundaries, the PR will be routed as
class/security-sensitiveandtier/full.Next: run sanitized Ollama + AntiGravity scouts, then make the narrow workflow/linter/test changes and verify locally.