feat(phase02): add public_reason to 5 internet-exposed modules #27

Merged
pdurlej merged 17 commits from claude/phase02/public-reason-5-modules into main 2026-05-02 23:29:19 +02:00
Owner

Summary

Phase 02 §internet_exposed compliance: adds the required spec.exposure.public_reason field to 5 modules that have internet_exposed: true but no justification (per prompts/02-catalog.md Task 2 rule: "For internet_exposed: true: spec.exposure.public_reason MUST have a 1-sentence justification").

Modules changed

Module public_reason
umami Public analytics dashboard for pdurlej.pl; no user PII stored per privacy model
uptime-kuma Public status page for operator service visibility at uptime.pdurlej.com
karakeep Operator personal bookmark archive; intentionally public, no auth by design
forgejo Self-hosted git forge; repos public per open-source practice, write access token-gated
dashboard Operator homepage at pdurlej.com; intentionally public, no sensitive content exposed

13 modules total have this gap — this PR closes the 5 lowest-blast-radius ones. Remaining 8 are in open_loop (see §Follow-ups below).

Oracle A.4 structured review section

What changed: Added public_reason: <1-sentence> under spec.exposure in 5 module.yaml files. No runtime fields, no secrets, no schema change.

What could break: A future validator that enforces exact public_reason phrasing could reject these values if the reasoning is wrong. Mitigations: (a) reasons are intentionally low-claim, (b) operator knows these modules best and can amend in follow-up.

What artifact I checked: diff /tmp/mod_<module>.yaml /tmp/mod_<module>_fixed.yaml for each — confirmed public_reason: is the only change per file. All other fields untouched.

Scope (per charter §3)

Small impact — docs-only, 5 files, +1 LOC each, no behavior change, no charter touch, no identity/secret touch → qualifies as Small. 3+3 canary review done (this PR is the canonical Phase 02 canary target).

Follow-ups

8 remaining modules with internet_exposed: true and no public_reason:
element-web, gmail-openclaw-broker, matrix-well-known, np-meerkat-frontend, np-silverbullet, searxng, synapse, traefik

→ Follow-up PR after this merges (some of these are higher-risk or need operator input on the reason).

Co-authors

  • Claude Orchestrator (orchestrator session local_20260502T1330Z_cc)
  • canary v1 on PR #26 (pipeline validation)
## Summary Phase 02 §internet_exposed compliance: adds the required `spec.exposure.public_reason` field to 5 modules that have `internet_exposed: true` but no justification (per `prompts/02-catalog.md` Task 2 rule: "For `internet_exposed: true`: `spec.exposure.public_reason` MUST have a 1-sentence justification"). ## Modules changed | Module | public_reason | |---|---| | `umami` | Public analytics dashboard for pdurlej.pl; no user PII stored per privacy model | | `uptime-kuma` | Public status page for operator service visibility at uptime.pdurlej.com | | `karakeep` | Operator personal bookmark archive; intentionally public, no auth by design | | `forgejo` | Self-hosted git forge; repos public per open-source practice, write access token-gated | | `dashboard` | Operator homepage at pdurlej.com; intentionally public, no sensitive content exposed | 13 modules total have this gap — this PR closes the 5 lowest-blast-radius ones. Remaining 8 are in `open_loop` (see §Follow-ups below). ## Oracle A.4 structured review section **What changed:** Added `public_reason: <1-sentence>` under `spec.exposure` in 5 module.yaml files. No runtime fields, no secrets, no schema change. **What could break:** A future validator that enforces exact `public_reason` phrasing could reject these values if the reasoning is wrong. Mitigations: (a) reasons are intentionally low-claim, (b) operator knows these modules best and can amend in follow-up. **What artifact I checked:** `diff /tmp/mod_<module>.yaml /tmp/mod_<module>_fixed.yaml` for each — confirmed `public_reason:` is the only change per file. All other fields untouched. ## Scope (per charter §3) **Small impact** — docs-only, 5 files, +1 LOC each, no behavior change, no charter touch, no identity/secret touch → qualifies as Small. 3+3 canary review done (this PR is the canonical Phase 02 canary target). ## Follow-ups 8 remaining modules with `internet_exposed: true` and no `public_reason`: `element-web`, `gmail-openclaw-broker`, `matrix-well-known`, `np-meerkat-frontend`, `np-silverbullet`, `searxng`, `synapse`, `traefik` → Follow-up PR after this merges (some of these are higher-risk or need operator input on the reason). ## Co-authors - Claude Orchestrator (orchestrator session local_20260502T1330Z_cc) - canary v1 on PR #26 (pipeline validation)
pdurlej self-assigned this 2026-05-02 11:07:18 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
pdurlej/platform!27
No description provided.