fix(w6d): tolerate Iskra approval latency #478
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
W6d-automerge-calibration
agent/claude-code
agent/codex
agent/hermes
agent/iskra
agent/ollama
agent/patchwarden
automerge-candidate
class/security-sensitive
cutover-gate
dependency/blocked
dependency/blocks-others
dependency/cross-repo
dependency/needs-confirmation
domain:agents
domain:ci
domain:docs
domain:forgejo
domain:infra
domain:memory
domain:runtime
domain:signal
domain:ux
flow/architecture
flow/blocked
flow/deployed
flow/done
flow/implementation
flow/intake
flow/maintained
flow/observed
flow/ready
flow/refining
flow/retired
flow/review
iterating
judge/codex-candidate
judge/hermes-candidate
judge/low-confidence
judge/needs-refinement
judge/operator-needed
judge/p0
judge/p1
judge/p2
judge/p3
judge/park
judge/patchwarden-candidate
judge/stale-priority
kind/adr
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/ops
kind/refactor
kind/research
large-impact
merge/auto
merge/manual
merge/manual-dependency-conflict
merge/manual-failing-tests
merge/manual-merge-conflict
merge/manual-missing-review
merge/manual-operator-preference
merge/manual-red-zone
merge/manual-security-sensitive
merge/manual-unclear-scope
merge/manual-unknown
meta
mode:operator-only
mode:patchwarden-iskra-approved
mode:safe-auto
needs-operator-decision
needs-triage
not-ready
observed/erroring
observed/needs-followup
observed/pending
observed/retire-candidate
observed/unused
observed/used
operator-emotional
owner-attention
phase/02
phase/03
priority:p0
priority:p1
priority:p2
priority:p3
proposed
ready-for-agent
ready-for-operator
recovery
review:claude-reviewed
review:codex-reviewed
review:dziadek-reviewed
review:needs-human
risk/exposure
risk/process
risk/product
risk/runtime
safety:external-write
safety:no-prod-mutation
safety:prod-impact
safety:secret-touch
size/large
size/medium
size/small
size/tiny
size/unknown
source/adr
source/agent-generated
source/manual
source/operator-chat
source/voice-note
status:blocked
status:codex-ready
status:merged:pending-evidence
status:needs-evidence
status:operator-needed
status:parked
tier/full
tier/lite
tier/stacked
tier:0-platform-substrate
tier:1-iskra-value-layer
tier:2-tools-products-modules
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feat
type:policy
type:research
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
pdurlej/platform!478
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "codex/w6d-matrix-mention-iskra"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Canary status: missing — rely on required Forgejo checks before merge
Canary Context Pack
Product story
W6d should let Iskra approve narrow automerge candidates through the Platform Approvals Matrix room without Piotr doing the final click. The latest smoke showed the gate logic is correct, but Iskra answered after the current five-minute workflow timeout.
What changed
@iskra:pdurlej.comtarget line to the Matrix approval request.m.mentionsfor Iskra when posting the request.Why it changed
The #476 smoke produced the exact
ISKRA_APPROVEresponse, but it arrived after the workflow had already timed out. This keeps the deterministic gate strict while tolerating real OpenClaw/Matrix queue latency.Files touched
.forgejo/workflows/automerge-pilot.ymlcontrol-plane/platformctl/ci/iskra_matrix_approval.pycontrol-plane/platformctl/tests/test_iskra_matrix_approval.pyRelevant context
W6d autonomous merge pilot; PRs #470, #475, #477, #476.
Runtime evidence
No runtime mutation. Evidence from the latest #476 Matrix thread: exact Iskra approval arrived about nine minutes after the request, beyond the previous 300s poll.
Known constraints
The gate still requires exact PR/head SHA approval from
@iskra:pdurlej.com; this PR does not relax deterministic merge eligibility.Explicit out-of-scope
No branch protection changes. No merge-token changes. No production service restart.
Requested decision
Approve and merge so the #476 e2e smoke can be re-run with a realistic approval timeout.
Merge blockers
Any evidence that Matrix
m.mentionsis unsupported in our homeserver/client path or that 15 minutes is too long for the deploy-host workflow budget.Spec sources read
.forgejo/workflows/automerge-pilot.yml— pilot timeout and Matrix stepcontrol-plane/platformctl/ci/iskra_matrix_approval.py— Matrix request and polling implementationcontrol-plane/platformctl/tests/test_iskra_matrix_approval.py— approval gate testsTests
git diff --checkPYTHONPATH=control-plane pytest -q control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_iskra_matrix_approval.py control-plane/platformctl/tests/test_forgejo_ci_scripts_contract.py→ 48 passed217a39fc304663466022