pdurlej/patchwarden

Fork 0

#2 Product Strategy (insights → bets ≤3 → principles) — LAST per strategy-as-synthesis #10

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-05-15 19:18:24 +02:00 by claude · 1 comment

claude commented

2026-05-15 19:18:24 +02:00

Collaborator

TL;DR (PL)

Cagan structure: insights (czego się nauczyliśmy z #3-#9) → focused bets ≤3 → principles. Wave 5 SEQUENTIAL — strategia jest synthesis, NIE input. To Iskra-coining nominee: "strategy as synthesis, not input". Wszystko inne musi być gotowe PRZED #2. Blocked on discovery (5-7 interviews completed via M2).

TL;DR (EN)

Cagan structure: insights (learned from #3-#9) → focused bets ≤3 → principles. Wave 5 LAST because strategy as synthesis, not input. Standard PM anti-pattern reversed. Blocked on M2 Discovery Validation (5-7 interviews) so bets are evidence-backed.

Scope

Section 1 — Insights (what we learned from #3-#9):

From #3 JTBD: primary forces-of-progress identified
From #4 Positioning: market category we claim ("self-hosted AI code governance")
From #5 Competitive: structural asymmetries vs incumbents
From #6 Four-Risks: primary risk is value (per OD5 default)
From #7 KPI Tree: north-star + leading indicators
From #8 Discovery: assumption tests prioritized
From #9 Business Model: unit economics + pricing locked
Each insight: 1-2 sentences, evidence-link

Section 2 — Focused bets (≤3 per Cagan p.114):
Each bet:

Bet statement — "we bet that [if we do X], [outcome Y happens within timeframe Z]"
Evidence backing — labeled as "evidence-backed" (post-M2) vs "assumption-pending-discovery"
Wrongness condition — "we'll know this bet is wrong if [observable signal by date]"
Resource commitment — % of operator time + cousin-family time

Operator's OD2 default: 3 bets. Sample shape (Plan agent suggested; operator finalizes):

Bet 1 (value-led): Forgejo + non-dev operator wedge has 50-175 paying users TAM
Bet 2 (architecture-led): 6-layer architecture deployable solo-orchestrated by Q4 2026
Bet 3 (defensibility-led): Apache-2.0 + Cloud + auto-heal dogfood = defensible vs Kodus / auditlm pivots

Section 3 — Principles (non-negotiables for product team):
Per Cagan: "we believe X, so we always do Y":

We believe operator sovereignty is sacred, so we always default to local-only on platform repo
We believe policy beats LLM vibes, so we always require evidence chain (file/rule/severity/SHA) before BLOCK verdict
We believe discovery is continuous, so we always maintain Torres weekly cadence
We believe focus enables shipping, so we always say no to features that broaden audience prematurely

What this artifact does NOT cover:

Tactical roadmap (that's docs/roadmap.md)
Feature specs (anti-roadmap)
Investor narrative (anti-roadmap)

Inputs (feedstock)

ALL of #3 JTBD, #4 Positioning, #5 Competitive, #6 Four-Risks, #7 KPI Tree, #8 Discovery, #9 Business Model
Discovery interview synthesis (post-M2 milestone)
Operator's inspired-cagan.md vault card — operator's Cagan framework internalization
Cagan Inspired Ch 8 (Product Strategy)
Empowered — strategy & insights framework

Skill draft

Anthropic Skill: product-management:write-spec (adapted for strategy)
Anti-prompt: "NOT a feature roadmap. NOT a goal-setting exercise. Cagan strategy = insights from evidence, focused bets ≤3, principles team holds non-negotiable. If draft has 5+ bets, reject. If bets have no wrongness condition, reject. If principles read like generic management ('be customer-centric'), reject."
Prime with: all Wave 1-4 artifact outputs + Cagan Inspired Ch 8 + operator's vault Cagan card

Dependencies

Blocked by: #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9 (ALL prior waves) + M2 milestone (5-7 discovery interviews) for status:blocked-on-discovery flag
Blocks: #10 Kill Criteria (operationalizes strategy)

Cagan-grade acceptance criteria

Universal (must pass all 5):

Evidence cited — every insight + bet links to source artifact (#3-#9) + discovery interview synthesis
Operator-readable <10 min — insights + bets + principles ≤2000w
Names the wrongness condition — each bet has explicit "wrong if [signal by date]"
Single concrete decision — moves docs/decisions.md by setting D16: "strategy locked v1.0 through M3 refresh; revisit Q4 2026"
Cousin-family attribution — credits skill, all prior artifacts, Cagan framework

Tier-0 anchor extras:

3-year horizon explicit — bets project to 2029, principles hold long-term
Leadership change test — successor PM reads strategy and knows what to ship next quarter

"Cagan would weep" stretch tests:

≤3 focused bets (operator OD2 default). If 5+ bets, FAIL.
No bet without wrongness condition + date — speculative strategy is theatre.
Principles non-negotiable — "we believe X, so we ALWAYS do Y". "We aim to..." = FAIL.

Operator decision points

This artifact gates on:

OD2 — Strategy bet count (default: 3 ✅ accepted in epic)
OD operator-final: bet selection from candidates (Plan agent suggests 3; operator picks final 3)
M2 milestone — 5-7 discovery interviews completed for evidence backing

Status flow

status:blocked-on-discovery + status:cagan-grade-review-pending → M2 closes → discovery synthesis incorporated → operator reviews → label flips → close → tick epic Wave 5 #2

Parent epic: #1 (this is artifact 2 of 11, but produced LAST in execution per strategy-as-synthesis)
Plan: /Users/pd/.claude/plans/deep-pondering-popcorn.md § Wave 5 + § "strategy as synthesis, not input"

Drafted by Prof Kong (claude Opus 4.7) on behalf of pdurlej, 2026-05-15.

## TL;DR (PL) Cagan structure: **insights** (czego się nauczyliśmy z #3-#9) → **focused bets ≤3** → **principles**. Wave 5 SEQUENTIAL — strategia jest **synthesis**, NIE input. To Iskra-coining nominee: *"strategy as synthesis, not input"*. Wszystko inne musi być gotowe PRZED #2. Blocked on discovery (5-7 interviews completed via M2). ## TL;DR (EN) Cagan structure: insights (learned from #3-#9) → focused bets ≤3 → principles. Wave 5 LAST because **strategy as synthesis, not input**. Standard PM anti-pattern reversed. Blocked on M2 Discovery Validation (5-7 interviews) so bets are evidence-backed. ## Scope **Section 1 — Insights** (what we learned from #3-#9): - From #3 JTBD: primary forces-of-progress identified - From #4 Positioning: market category we claim ("self-hosted AI code governance") - From #5 Competitive: structural asymmetries vs incumbents - From #6 Four-Risks: primary risk is value (per OD5 default) - From #7 KPI Tree: north-star + leading indicators - From #8 Discovery: assumption tests prioritized - From #9 Business Model: unit economics + pricing locked - Each insight: 1-2 sentences, evidence-link **Section 2 — Focused bets (≤3 per Cagan p.114)**: Each bet: - **Bet statement** — "we bet that [if we do X], [outcome Y happens within timeframe Z]" - **Evidence backing** — labeled as "evidence-backed" (post-M2) vs "assumption-pending-discovery" - **Wrongness condition** — "we'll know this bet is wrong if [observable signal by date]" - **Resource commitment** — % of operator time + cousin-family time Operator's OD2 default: 3 bets. Sample shape (Plan agent suggested; operator finalizes): - **Bet 1 (value-led)**: Forgejo + non-dev operator wedge has 50-175 paying users TAM - **Bet 2 (architecture-led)**: 6-layer architecture deployable solo-orchestrated by Q4 2026 - **Bet 3 (defensibility-led)**: Apache-2.0 + Cloud + auto-heal dogfood = defensible vs Kodus / auditlm pivots **Section 3 — Principles** (non-negotiables for product team): Per Cagan: "we believe X, so we always do Y": - We believe **operator sovereignty is sacred**, so we always **default to local-only on `platform` repo** - We believe **policy beats LLM vibes**, so we always **require evidence chain (file/rule/severity/SHA) before BLOCK verdict** - We believe **discovery is continuous**, so we always **maintain Torres weekly cadence** - We believe **focus enables shipping**, so we always **say no to features that broaden audience prematurely** **What this artifact does NOT cover**: - Tactical roadmap (that's `docs/roadmap.md`) - Feature specs (anti-roadmap) - Investor narrative (anti-roadmap) ## Inputs (feedstock) - ALL of #3 JTBD, #4 Positioning, #5 Competitive, #6 Four-Risks, #7 KPI Tree, #8 Discovery, #9 Business Model - Discovery interview synthesis (post-M2 milestone) - Operator's `inspired-cagan.md` vault card — operator's Cagan framework internalization - Cagan *Inspired* Ch 8 (Product Strategy) - *Empowered* — strategy & insights framework ## Skill draft - **Anthropic Skill**: `product-management:write-spec` (adapted for strategy) - **Anti-prompt**: *"NOT a feature roadmap. NOT a goal-setting exercise. Cagan strategy = insights from evidence, focused bets ≤3, principles team holds non-negotiable. If draft has 5+ bets, reject. If bets have no wrongness condition, reject. If principles read like generic management ('be customer-centric'), reject."* - **Prime with**: all Wave 1-4 artifact outputs + Cagan *Inspired* Ch 8 + operator's vault Cagan card ## Dependencies Blocked by: #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9 (ALL prior waves) + M2 milestone (5-7 discovery interviews) for `status:blocked-on-discovery` flag Blocks: #10 Kill Criteria (operationalizes strategy) ## Cagan-grade acceptance criteria **Universal (must pass all 5)**: 1. **Evidence cited** — every insight + bet links to source artifact (#3-#9) + discovery interview synthesis 2. **Operator-readable <10 min** — insights + bets + principles ≤2000w 3. **Names the wrongness condition** — each bet has explicit "wrong if [signal by date]" 4. **Single concrete decision** — moves `docs/decisions.md` by setting D16: "strategy locked v1.0 through M3 refresh; revisit Q4 2026" 5. **Cousin-family attribution** — credits skill, all prior artifacts, Cagan framework **Tier-0 anchor extras**: - **3-year horizon explicit** — bets project to 2029, principles hold long-term - **Leadership change test** — successor PM reads strategy and knows what to ship next quarter **"Cagan would weep" stretch tests**: - **≤3 focused bets** (operator OD2 default). If 5+ bets, FAIL. - **No bet without wrongness condition + date** — speculative strategy is theatre. - **Principles non-negotiable** — "we believe X, so we ALWAYS do Y". "We aim to..." = FAIL. ## Operator decision points This artifact gates on: - **OD2** — Strategy bet count (default: 3 ✅ accepted in epic) - **OD operator-final**: bet selection from candidates (Plan agent suggests 3; operator picks final 3) - **M2 milestone** — 5-7 discovery interviews completed for evidence backing ## Status flow `status:blocked-on-discovery` + `status:cagan-grade-review-pending` → M2 closes → discovery synthesis incorporated → operator reviews → label flips → close → tick epic Wave 5 #2 --- Parent epic: #1 (this is artifact 2 of 11, but produced LAST in execution per strategy-as-synthesis) Plan: `/Users/pd/.claude/plans/deep-pondering-popcorn.md` § Wave 5 + § "strategy as synthesis, not input" *Drafted by Prof Kong (claude Opus 4.7) on behalf of pdurlej, 2026-05-15.*

claude added this to the M1: Cagan Package v1.0 milestone

2026-05-15 19:18:24 +02:00

claude added the

kind:artifact

area:product-strategy

status:cagan-grade-review-pending

status:blocked-on-discovery

wave:5-operating

tier:0-anchor

labels

2026-05-15 19:18:24 +02:00

claude referenced this issue

2026-05-15 19:18:57 +02:00

#10 Kill Criteria ("If by [date] [signal], we [pivot/park/kill]") #11

claude referenced this issue

2026-05-15 19:21:36 +02:00

Epic: Cagan-grade product strategy package (11 artifacts × 5 waves) #1

claude referenced this issue from a commit

2026-05-15 21:11:49 +02:00

docs/product: Cagan-grade product strategy package v1.0 (11 artifacts batch)

claude referenced this issue

2026-05-15 21:12:42 +02:00

Epic: Cagan-grade product strategy package (11 artifacts × 5 waves) #1

claude referenced this issue

2026-05-15 21:37:34 +02:00

#1 Product Vision Narrative (3-year motivational prose) #2

claude referenced this issue

2026-05-15 22:03:45 +02:00

#12 Strategic Thesis — defense-in-depth + Goldratt constraint-redirect + emergent selection pressure #13

claude referenced this issue

2026-05-15 22:04:31 +02:00

#6 Four-Risks Assessment (Cagan: value / usability / feasibility / viability) #6

claude referenced this issue

2026-05-26 10:54:35 +02:00

#2 Product Strategy v2.0 — post-M2 discovery synthesis update #35

claude referenced this issue

2026-05-26 10:56:33 +02:00

docs(v0): reflect M1 close progress in product README (TL;DR + Definition of done) #38

claude commented

2026-05-26 12:45:28 +02:00

Author

Collaborator

Closed as v1.0-draft via operator voice ack 2026-05-26, per pre-staged decision (close path B w propozycji 2026-05-26).

Strategy v1.0 locked per D16. Follow-up #35 trzyma post-M2 discovery synthesis update do strategy v2.0 w M3 milestone (2026-10-15).

Operator highlights:

Insights ack całość
Defensibility: cross-AI + Forgejo + indie hack friendly pricing — ack
"Labor of Law until revenue bardzo słodkie"
Bet 1 — Value-led: do 200 osób, timeline flex ("nie wiem czy do końca roku bym sobie dał termin")
Bet 2 — Architecture-led: 6 vs 7 warstw flex ("zobaczymy iloma wyrstw wyjdziemy, ale na pewno powinno być sporo")
Bet 3 — Defensibility-led: cross-AI + Forgejo + indie pricing + "self-hosted" — ack
P4 (focus enables shipping) = MOST BINDING — "to jest klucz wartości"
Anti-bets (LLM review quality bet rejected) — "tak tak tak"
D16 — operator deleguje na claude: "może być OK, możesz zrobić co uważasz jeśli chodzi o zamknięcie tego"

D16 (strategy v1.0 locked through M3 refresh 2026-10-15) → claude/patchwarden-decisions-batch PR.

Removed labels: status:cagan-grade-review-pending, status:blocked-on-discovery.

Status: cagan-grade-approved (as v1.0-draft). — claude (Patchwarden dedicated thread)

**Closed as v1.0-draft via operator voice ack 2026-05-26**, per pre-staged decision (close path B w propozycji 2026-05-26). Strategy v1.0 locked per D16. Follow-up [#35](../issues/35) trzyma post-M2 discovery synthesis update do strategy v2.0 w M3 milestone (2026-10-15). Operator highlights: - Insights ack całość - Defensibility: cross-AI + Forgejo + **indie hack friendly** pricing — ack - *"Labor of Law until revenue bardzo słodkie"* - **Bet 1 — Value-led**: do 200 osób, **timeline flex** (*"nie wiem czy do końca roku bym sobie dał termin"*) - **Bet 2 — Architecture-led**: 6 vs 7 warstw **flex** (*"zobaczymy iloma wyrstw wyjdziemy, ale na pewno powinno być sporo"*) - **Bet 3 — Defensibility-led**: cross-AI + Forgejo + indie pricing + "self-hosted" — ack - **P4 (focus enables shipping) = MOST BINDING** — *"to jest klucz wartości"* - Anti-bets (LLM review quality bet rejected) — *"tak tak tak"* - D16 — operator deleguje na claude: *"może być OK, możesz zrobić co uważasz jeśli chodzi o zamknięcie tego"* **D16** (strategy v1.0 locked through M3 refresh 2026-10-15) → `claude/patchwarden-decisions-batch` PR. Removed labels: `status:cagan-grade-review-pending`, `status:blocked-on-discovery`. Status: `cagan-grade-approved` (as v1.0-draft). — claude (Patchwarden dedicated thread)

claude closed this issue

2026-05-26 12:46:08 +02:00

claude referenced this issue

2026-05-26 12:53:29 +02:00

docs(v0): record 11 M1 close decisions D8/D8b/D9/D10/D11/D12-mod/D15/D16/D17/D18/D19 #40

claude referenced this issue

2026-05-26 13:16:03 +02:00

Epic: Cagan-grade product strategy package (11 artifacts × 5 waves) #1

claude referenced this issue

2026-06-22 23:57:48 +02:00

feat(autoheal): Slice E — model real Iskra runtime-repair evidence (now unblocked) #102